Revisiting rural healthcare access through Held’s ethics of care

Author:

Quilliam ClaireORCID,Glenister KristenORCID,Ervin KayeORCID,Weller-Newton JenniferORCID

Abstract

AbstractAccess to healthcare and health seeking behaviours of rural people often hinge on the existing relationships between healthcare providers and (prospective) healthcare users. However, rich micro-level health professional-healthcare user relationships and the unique relational context of rural settings are largely missing from dominant rural healthcare access conceptual frameworks. We argue rural healthcare access conceptualisations require revisiting from a relational perspective to ensure future healthcare access policy accounts for the relational nature of healthcare in rural contexts. Ethics of care is a moral theory informed by feminism which rejects liberal individualist notions and emphasises interdependence. We used Held’s ethics of care characteristics to examine Russell and colleagues’ healthcare access framework and dimensions for rural and remote populations. This process revealed Held’s ethics of care characteristics are only somewhat evident across Russell et al.’s dimensions: most evident in the acceptability and accommodation dimensions, and most absent in the availability and affordability dimensions. Future rural healthcare access frameworks need to pay further attention to the relational aspects of rural healthcare, particularly around the availability and affordability of healthcare, to bolster future efforts to improve healthcare access for rural people.

Funder

University of Melbourne

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Health (social science)

Reference63 articles.

1. Aday, L.A., and R.M. Andersen. 1981. Equity of access to medical care: A conceptual and empirical overview. Medical Care 19 (12): 4–27.

2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2019. Rural and remote health: Web report. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/rural-health/rural-remote-health/contents/rural-health. Accessed 17 March 2022.

3. Barker, A.R., T.D. McBride, K.J. Mueller, and K.A. Huntzberry. 2019. The market mechanism and health insurance in rural places: Lessons learned from an economics and policy perspective. Iowa City, IA: Rural Policy Research Institute, https://rupri.public-health.uiowa.edu/publications/policypapers.html. Accessed 17 March 2022.

4. Beck, R.S., R. Daughtridge, and P.D. Sloane. 2002. Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: A systematic review. The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 15 (1): 25–38.

5. Bourke, L., J.S. Humphreys, J. Wakerman, and J. Taylor. 2012. Understanding rural and remote health: A framework for analysis in Australia. Health and Place 18 (3): 496–503.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3