INVESTIGATIONS IN THE TURKISH EDUCATION SYSTEM: STRUCTURE, PROCESS AND ITS REFLECTIONS

Author:

Eranıl Anıl Kadir1ORCID,Eyice Ramazan2ORCID,Atan Muhammed2ORCID,Alici Temel2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Nevşehir Milli Eğitim Müdürlüğü

2. TC MİLLİ EĞİTİM BAKANLIĞI VAN

Abstract

The aim of this research is to seek answers to ‘what the opinions of the investigated educators on the structure and running of the investigations are and what the reflections of the investigations are? The research conforms to phenomenology design which is one of qualitative research methods. Semi-structured interview form was employed to collect data. The study group of the research consists of 15 educators (teacher, school principal and vice principal) who have undergone an investigation. Criterion sampling method was used and maximum diversity was considered in the selection of the participants. The data were analyzed through content analysis by following an inductive pattern. As a result of the analyses, a total of 10 themes and 65 codes were identified. Six themes were created regarding the opinions of the investigated educators (IEs) on the structure and running of the investigation system. Based on the frequency density, the themes are as follows respectively: ‘the opinions of the investigated (f=26), the penalty imposed (f=24), the investigator’s attitudes (f=22), the reason for the investigation (f=20), the type of investigation (f=17) and the attitudes and behaviours of the administration (f=13)’. Regarding the impacts and opinions that investigation processes have left on the investigated educators, four themes were generated. Based on the frequency density, the themes are as follows respectively: ‘the impact on the profession (f=29), the impact on the health (f=21), thoughts and actions in the course of the investigation (f=10), the impact on the relationship (f=7)’.

Publisher

Kamu Ic Denetcileri Dernegi

Reference48 articles.

1. Aküzüm, C., & Özmen, F. (2013). Eğitim denetmenlerinin rollerini gerçekleştirme yeterlikleri: Bir Meta-Sentez Çalışması, Ekev Akademi Dergisi, (56), 97-120.

2. Altınok, F. (2013). İlkokul ve ortaokullarda yapılan sınıf içi denetim etkinliklerinin klinik denetim modeli açısından incelenmesi [Unpublished master dissertation]. Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Antalya.

3. Altun, B. (2014). Denetime eleştirel yaklaşım: Öğretmen denetimi nasıl olmalı? [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi.

4. Arıca, M. N. (2000). Memur suçları ve soruşturma. İlksan Matbaası

5. Aslanargun, E., & Göksoy, S. (2013). Öğretmen denetimini kim yapmalıdır?, Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(ÖYGE Özel Sayısı/ÖYGE Special Issue), 98-121. https://doi.org/10.12780/UUSBD177

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3