Affiliation:
1. A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center
2. LLC Philips Healthcare
3. National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
4. Research and Practical Clinical Center of Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies
Abstract
Additional suppression of the background signal in diffusion-weighted images (DWIBS) allows to get more contrast images to highlight areas with restricted diffusion, for example, in many malignant primary and metastatic tumors. Due to fundamental differences in DWIBS and DWI acquisition, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values may differ, which could negatively affect attempts to compare with the available literature data or with conventional DWI studies. Purpose. Evaluation of the correctness of the calculation of the ADC values based on DWIBS images, compared to regular DWI. Material and methods. A comparative analysis of the ADC values obtained using DWIBS and conventional DWI on an MR-compatible phantom and on 20 healthy volunteers was carried out. Free breathing DWIBS as well as DWI with breath synchronization were acquired using 1.5 T MRI scanner. Results and discussion. ADC values measured with DWIBS and DWI were found to coincides well both for the phantom and for the volunteers in all the areas (vertebra, kidney, spleen), except for the liver, where the ADC values obtained from DWIBS images were 11 % lower than with standard DWI (1.06 vs 0.92 mm2/s). This may be due to the greater displacement of the liver during respiratory movements. The advantages of the DWIBS technique include a significant decrease in scan time (1.5-2 times with a 10 % decrease in signal-to-noise ratio compared to routine DWI), which allows for a quantitative analysis of ADC values in a whole-body scan in a comfortable timing for the patient. Conclusion. DWIBS can be recommended for calculating ADC values, however, a comparative analysis of ADC values in organs and tissues exposed to strong respiratory movements require additional assessments of repeatability and reproducibility directly when comparing areas with a strongly pronounced diffusion restriction.
Publisher
Association of Medical Physicists in Russia
Reference21 articles.
1. Messina C, Bignone R, Bruno A, et al. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Oncology: An Update. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(6):1493. Published 2020 Jun 8. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061493.
2. Морозов АК, Махсон АН, Карпов ИН. Магнитно-резонансная томография всего тела (DWIBS). Возможности и перспективы применения в костной патологии // Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им Н.Н. Прио-рова. 2015; 22(2): 19-24. DOI: 10.17816/vto201522219-24 [Morozov AK, Makhson AN, Karpov IN. Whole body magnetic resonance imaging (DWIBS). Possibilities and prospects of application in bone pathology. Bulletin of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov. 2015; 22(2): 19-24. DOI: 10.17816/vto201522219-24 (In Russian)].
3. Takahara T, Imai Y, Yamashita T, Yasuda S, Nasu S, Van Cauteren M. Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high-resolution 3D display. Radiat Med. 2004; 22(4): 275-82.
4. Bydder GM, Young IR. MR imaging: clinical use of the inversion recovery sequence. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985; 9: 659-75.
5. Анисимов НВ. Одновременное подавление сигналов воды и жира в экспериментах по магнитно-резонансной томографии Вестник Московского Университета. Серия 3. Физика Аcтрономия 2004; 2: 35-8 [Anisimov NV. Simultaneous suppression of water and fat signals in magnetic resonance imaging experiments Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 3. Physics Astronomy 2004; 2: 35-8 (In Russian)].