APOSTEL 2.0 Recommendations for Reporting Quantitative Optical Coherence Tomography Studies

Author:

Aytulun AykutORCID,Cruz-Herranz Andrés,Aktas Orhan,Balcer Laura J.,Balk Lisanne,Barboni Piero,Blanco Augusto Azuara,Calabresi Peter A.ORCID,Costello Fiona,Sanchez-Dalmau Bernardo,DeBuc Delia Cabrera,Feltgen Nicolas,Finger Robert P.,Frederiksen Jette Lautrup,Frohman Elliot,Frohman Teresa,Garway-Heath David,Gabilondo IñigoORCID,Graves Jennifer S.,Green Ari J.,Hartung Hans-Peter,Havla JoachimORCID,Holz Frank G.,Imitola Jaime,Kenney Rachel,Klistorner Alexander,Knier BenjaminORCID,Korn ThomasORCID,Kolbe Scott,Krämer Julia,Lagrèze Wolf A.,Leocani Letizia,Maier OliverORCID,Martínez-Lapiscina Elena H.,Meuth Sven,Outteryck Olivier,Paul FriedemannORCID,Petzold AxelORCID,Pihl-Jensen Gorm,Preiningerova Jana LizrovaORCID,Rebolleda Gema,Ringelstein Marius,Saidha Shiv,Schippling Sven,Schuman Joel S.,Sergott Robert C.,Toosy AhmedORCID,Villoslada PabloORCID,Wolf SebastianORCID,Yeh E. AnnORCID,Yu-Wai-Man PatrickORCID,Zimmermann Hanna G.,Brandt Alexander U.ORCID,Albrecht PhilippORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveTo update the consensus recommendations for reporting of quantitative optical coherence tomography (OCT) study results, thus revising the previously published Advised Protocol for OCT Study Terminology and Elements (APOSTEL) recommendations.MethodsTo identify studies reporting quantitative OCT results, we performed a PubMed search for the terms “quantitative” and “optical coherence tomography” from 2015 to 2017. Corresponding authors of the identified publications were invited to provide feedback on the initial APOSTEL recommendations via online surveys following the principle of a modified Delphi method. The results were evaluated and discussed by a panel of experts and changes to the initial recommendations were proposed. A final survey was recirculated among the corresponding authors to obtain a majority vote on the proposed changes.ResultsA total of 116 authors participated in the surveys, resulting in 15 suggestions, of which 12 were finally accepted and incorporated into an updated 9-point checklist. We harmonized the nomenclature of the outer retinal layers, added the exact area of measurement to the description of volume scans, and suggested reporting device-specific features. We advised to address potential bias in manual segmentation or manual correction of segmentation errors. References to specific reporting guidelines and room light conditions were removed. The participants' consensus with the recommendations increased from 80% for the previous APOSTEL version to greater than 90%.ConclusionsThe modified Delphi method resulted in an expert-led guideline (evidence Class III; Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations [GRADE] criteria) concerning study protocol, acquisition device, acquisition settings, scanning protocol, funduscopic imaging, postacquisition data selection, postacquisition analysis, nomenclature and abbreviations, and statistical approach. It will be essential to update these recommendations to new research and practices regularly.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical)

Cited by 126 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3