APOSTEL 2.0 Recommendations for Reporting Quantitative Optical Coherence Tomography Studies
-
Published:2021-04-28
Issue:2
Volume:97
Page:68-79
-
ISSN:0028-3878
-
Container-title:Neurology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Neurology
Author:
Aytulun AykutORCID, Cruz-Herranz Andrés, Aktas Orhan, Balcer Laura J., Balk Lisanne, Barboni Piero, Blanco Augusto Azuara, Calabresi Peter A.ORCID, Costello Fiona, Sanchez-Dalmau Bernardo, DeBuc Delia Cabrera, Feltgen Nicolas, Finger Robert P., Frederiksen Jette Lautrup, Frohman Elliot, Frohman Teresa, Garway-Heath David, Gabilondo IñigoORCID, Graves Jennifer S., Green Ari J., Hartung Hans-Peter, Havla JoachimORCID, Holz Frank G., Imitola Jaime, Kenney Rachel, Klistorner Alexander, Knier BenjaminORCID, Korn ThomasORCID, Kolbe Scott, Krämer Julia, Lagrèze Wolf A., Leocani Letizia, Maier OliverORCID, Martínez-Lapiscina Elena H., Meuth Sven, Outteryck Olivier, Paul FriedemannORCID, Petzold AxelORCID, Pihl-Jensen Gorm, Preiningerova Jana LizrovaORCID, Rebolleda Gema, Ringelstein Marius, Saidha Shiv, Schippling Sven, Schuman Joel S., Sergott Robert C., Toosy AhmedORCID, Villoslada PabloORCID, Wolf SebastianORCID, Yeh E. AnnORCID, Yu-Wai-Man PatrickORCID, Zimmermann Hanna G., Brandt Alexander U.ORCID, Albrecht PhilippORCID
Abstract
ObjectiveTo update the consensus recommendations for reporting of quantitative optical coherence tomography (OCT) study results, thus revising the previously published Advised Protocol for OCT Study Terminology and Elements (APOSTEL) recommendations.MethodsTo identify studies reporting quantitative OCT results, we performed a PubMed search for the terms “quantitative” and “optical coherence tomography” from 2015 to 2017. Corresponding authors of the identified publications were invited to provide feedback on the initial APOSTEL recommendations via online surveys following the principle of a modified Delphi method. The results were evaluated and discussed by a panel of experts and changes to the initial recommendations were proposed. A final survey was recirculated among the corresponding authors to obtain a majority vote on the proposed changes.ResultsA total of 116 authors participated in the surveys, resulting in 15 suggestions, of which 12 were finally accepted and incorporated into an updated 9-point checklist. We harmonized the nomenclature of the outer retinal layers, added the exact area of measurement to the description of volume scans, and suggested reporting device-specific features. We advised to address potential bias in manual segmentation or manual correction of segmentation errors. References to specific reporting guidelines and room light conditions were removed. The participants' consensus with the recommendations increased from 80% for the previous APOSTEL version to greater than 90%.ConclusionsThe modified Delphi method resulted in an expert-led guideline (evidence Class III; Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations [GRADE] criteria) concerning study protocol, acquisition device, acquisition settings, scanning protocol, funduscopic imaging, postacquisition data selection, postacquisition analysis, nomenclature and abbreviations, and statistical approach. It will be essential to update these recommendations to new research and practices regularly.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Neurology (clinical)
Cited by
126 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|