Author:
Hall Deborah A.,Ramos Alberto R.,Gelfand Jeffrey Marc,Videnovic Aleksander,Benatar Michael,Cahill Carolyn,Kluger Benzi M.,Goldman Myla
Abstract
ObjectiveTo study and provide an update on the state of clinical research in neurology in the United States.MethodsUS American Academy of Neurology members and chairs of departments of neurology were surveyed regarding clinical research in 2016. NIH data on the neuroscience pipeline and extramural grant funding were also collected.ResultsThe response rate was 32% (n = 254) for nonchair researchers and 58% (n = 67) for department chairs. Researcher respondents were on average 50 years old, 66% were men, and 81% were actively conducting clinical research, with phase II/III clinical trials and outcome measure studies being the most common type of research conducted. Time to conduct research, recruitment, and administrative burden were the major barriers reported. According to department chairs, funding and training opportunities in patient-oriented research have increased over the last 10 years. Overall, applicants to neuroscience-specific NIH institutes for extramural funding have decreased over the same time period.ConclusionsThe state of clinical research in neurology has remained relatively stable over the last 10 years, but neurologists still have barriers in conducting clinical research. There has been an interval decrease in neuroscience applicants for NIH funding, which raises concerns about the pipeline and future of clinical research in neurology. These results will serve as a reference for the development of solutions to these issues.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference7 articles.
1. Irvine H. Page lecture 1983. The future of clinical investigation;Wyngaarden;Cleve Clin Q,1984
2. Status of clinical research in neurology. Report of the Clinical Research Subcommittee of the Scientific Issues Committee of the American Academy of Neurology;Neurology,1995
3. The state of patient-oriented research in neurology
4. Decline of clinical research in academic medical centers
5. Integration of academic and clinical performance-based faculty compensation plans: a system and its impact on an anaesthesiology department †‡ †This report was previously presented, in part, at the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association of University Anesthesiologists, Cleveland, OH, USA, May 17–19, 2012; at the 27th Annual Meeting of the Society for Education in Anesthesia, Milwaukee, WI, USA, June 1–3, 2012; and at the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Washington, DC, USA, October 13–17, 2012.‡This article is accompanied by Editorial II.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献