ExACtly zero or once

Author:

Bennett Caitlin A.,Petrovski Slavé,Oliver Karen L.,Berkovic Samuel F.

Abstract

Objective:To assist the interpretation of genomic data for common epilepsies, we asked whether variants implicated in mild epilepsies in autosomal dominant families are present in the general population.Methods:We studied 12 genes for the milder epilepsies and identified published variants with strong segregation support (de novo germline mutation or ≥4 affected family members). These variants were checked in the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC), a database of genetic variation in over 60,000 individuals. We subsequently evaluated variants in these epilepsy genes that lacked strong segregation support. To determine whether the findings in epilepsies were representative of other diseases, we also assessed the presence of variants in other dominant neurologic disorders (e.g., CADASIL).Results:Published epilepsy variants with strong segregation support (n = 65) were absent (n = 61) or present once (n = 4) in ExAC. By contrast, of 46 published epilepsy variants without strong segregation support, 8 occurred recurrently (2–186 times). Similarly, none of the 45 disease-associated variants from other neurologic disorders with strong segregation support occurred more than once in ExAC. Reanalysis using the larger ExAC V2 plus gnomAD reference cohort showed consistent results.Conclusions:Variants causing autosomal dominant epilepsies are ultra-rare in the general population. Variants observed more than once in ExAC were only found among reports without strong segregation support, suggesting that they may be benign. Clinicians are increasingly faced with the interpretation of genetic variants of unknown significance. These data illustrate that variants present more than once in ExAC are less likely to be pathogenic, reinforcing the valuable clinical role of ExAC.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Genetics(clinical),Clinical Neurology

Cited by 36 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3