A Pragmatic, Data-Driven Method to Determine Cutoffs for CSF Biomarkers of Alzheimer Disease Based on Validation Against PET Imaging

Author:

Dumurgier JulienORCID,Sabia SéverineORCID,Zetterberg HenrikORCID,Teunissen Charlotte E.ORCID,Hanseeuw BernardORCID,Orellana Adelina,Schraen SusannaORCID,Gabelle AudreyORCID,Boada MercèORCID,Lebouvier ThibaudORCID,Willemse Eline A.J.,Cognat EmmanuelORCID,Ruiz AgustinORCID,Hourregue Claire,Lilamand MatthieuORCID,Bouaziz-Amar Elodie,Laplanche Jean-Louis,Lehmann Sylvain,Pasquier FlorenceORCID,Scheltens PhilipORCID,Blennow KajORCID,Singh-Manoux ArchanaORCID,Paquet Claire,

Abstract

Background and ObjectivesTo elaborate a new algorithm to establish a standardized method to define cutoffs for CSF biomarkers of Alzheimer disease (AD) by validating the algorithm against CSF classification derived from PET imaging.MethodsLow and high levels of CSF phosphorylated tau were first identified to establish optimal cutoffs for CSF β-amyloid (Aβ) peptide biomarkers. These Aβ cutoffs were then used to determine cutoffs for CSF tau and phosphorylated tau markers. We compared this algorithm to a reference method, based on tau and amyloid PET imaging status (ADNI study), and then applied the algorithm to 10 large clinical cohorts of patients.ResultsA total of 6,922 patients with CSF biomarker data were included (mean [SD] age: 70.6 [8.5] years, 51.0% women). In the ADNI study population (n = 497), the agreement between classification based on our algorithm and the one based on amyloid/tau PET imaging was high, with Cohen's kappa coefficient between 0.87 and 0.99. Applying the algorithm to 10 large cohorts of patients (n = 6,425), the proportion of persons with AD ranged from 25.9% to 43.5%.DiscussionThe proposed novel, pragmatic method to determine CSF biomarker cutoffs for AD does not require assessment of other biomarkers or assumptions concerning the clinical diagnosis of patients. Use of this standardized algorithm is likely to reduce heterogeneity in AD classification.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3