Refractory Status Epilepticus: Risk Factors and Analysis of Intubation in the Multicenter SENSE Registry

Author:

Beuchat IsabelleORCID,Rosenow FelixORCID,Kellinghaus ChristophORCID,Trinka Eugen,Unterberger IrisORCID,Rüegg Stephan,Sutter RaoulORCID,Tilz Christian,Uzelac ZeljkoORCID,Rossetti AndreaORCID,Strzelczyk AdamORCID

Abstract

Background and objectives:Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) bear significant morbidity and mortality. Therapy escalation and in some cases intubation are recommended. Most existing studies are retrospective and focus on ICUs. We aimed to describe routine-care management, and analyze determinants of RSE development and outcomes in a large multicenter cohort.Methods:We performed post hoc analysis of an observational, cohort study, who prospectively registered all consecutive adults with SE at 9 centers from 3 German-speaking countries. Only incident episodes were included. Ongoing SE despite 2 anti-seizure medications was defined as RSE. Patients intubated during first- or second-line treatments were excluded. Variables investigated included demographics, severity (Status Epilepticus Severity Score), etiology, and guideline-compliant treatment (defined as fixed minimum doses). Outcome parameters included survival and mRS at baseline and discharge (good: 0–2 or absence of worsening compared with pre-hospitalization).Results:Among 1179 SE episodes from 1049 adults, 996 patients were eligible (median age: 70 years, 52% female), of which 545 (54.7%) developed RSE. RSE was associated with higher baseline mRS (p<0.001) and treatment deviation from guidelines (p<0.001, OR 0.09; 95%CI 0.06-0.1). Good outcomes were observed in 52.7% of refractory patients, correlating with lower status epilepticus severity (p<0.001), absence of acute etiology (p<0.001, OR 0.5 95%CI 0.3-0.7), adequate first-line benzodiazepine dose (p<0.001, OR 2.5 95%CI 1.6-4.0), shorter durations of SE and hospitalization (both p<0.001), and lack of intubation (p<0.001, OR 0.4 95%CI 0.3-0.6). Most (71.7%) refractory patients were not intubated. Intubation was associated with younger age (p=0.006), more severe consciousness disturbances (p<0.001, OR 3.2 95%CI 2.1-4.8), more severe SE types (p<0.001), higher severity score (p=0.009), acute etiologies (p=0.01, OR 1.6 95%CI 1.1-2.4), more anti-seizure medications (p<0.001), initial treatment after shorter latency (p=0.01), worse outcomes (p<0.001, OR 0.4 95%CI 0.4-0.6), and longer hospitalizations (p<0.001).Discussion:Variables associated with RSE were identified, some potentially preventable. More than 70% of RSE were treated without intubation, suggesting that focal RSE without deep impairment of consciousness, in older patients, may be successfully treated outside ICUs.Trial Registration:Original cohort study registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00000725).

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3