What constitutes high quality of care for adults with epilepsy?

Author:

Pugh M.J.V.,Berlowitz D. R.,Montouris G.,Bokhour B.,Cramer J. A.,Bohm V.,Bollinger M.,Helmers S.,Ettinger A.,Meador K. J.,Fountain N.,Boggs J.,Tatum W. O.,Knoefel J.,Harden C.,Mattson R. H.,Kazis L.

Abstract

Background: Providers are increasingly being held accountable for the quality of care provided. While quality indicators have been used to benchmark the quality of care for a number of other disease states, no such measures are available for evaluating the quality of care provided to adults with epilepsy. In order to assess and improve quality of care, it is critical to develop valid quality indicators. Our objective is to describe the development of quality indicators for evaluating care of adults with epilepsy. As most care is provided in primary and general neurology care, we focused our assessment of quality on care within primary care and general neurology clinics.Methods: We reviewed existing national clinical guidelines and systematic reviews of the literature to develop an initial list of quality indicators; supplemented the list with indicators derived from patient focus groups; and convened a 10-member expert panel to rate the appropriateness, reliability, and necessity of each quality indicator.Results: From the original 37 evidence-based and 10 patient-based quality indicators, the panel identified 24 evidence-based and 5 patient-based indicators as appropriate indicators of quality. Of these, the panel identified 9 that were not necessary for high quality care.Conclusion: There is, at best, a poor understanding of the quality of care provided for adults with epilepsy. These indicators, developed based on published evidence, expert opinion, and patient perceptions, provide a basis to assess and improve the quality of care for this population.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical)

Reference40 articles.

1. Kerr EA, Asch SM, Hamilton EG, McGlynn EA. Quality of care for cardiopulmonary conditions: a review of the literature and quality indicators. California: RAND, 2000.

2. Kerr EA, Asch SM, Hamilton EG, McGlynn EA. Quality of care for general medical conditions: a review of the literature and quality indicators. California: RAND, 2000.

3. The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United States

4. Potentially Inappropriate Antiepileptic Drugs for Elderly Patients with Epilepsy

5. Depression but not seizure frequency predicts quality of life in treatment-resistant epilepsy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3