Author:
Barrett A. M.,Beversdorf D. Q.,Crucian G. P.,Heilman K. M.
Abstract
Objective: To learn whether there was a defect in an attentional floodlight. We used a line decision task for which subjects had to decide if two line segments separated by a gap were one line or two parallel lines. We varied the area of the gap and, therefore, the area over which subjects needed to spread attention to perform the task correctly.Background: Visual tasks requiring focused attention use an attentional spotlight. Other visual tasks requiring spatially distributed attention may require a floodlight. Neglect after right hemisphere stroke can be associated with a defect in the attentional spotlight.Results and Conclusions: Two patients with neglect after right hemisphere stroke performed more poorly than normal control subjects and left hemisphere-damaged control subjects as the area of spread in the gap increased. Right hemisphere-damaged patients did not differ from control subjects' performance on another visuospatial parameter-the degree of discontinuity between the line segments. These results support a defective attentional floodlight in neglect.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference20 articles.
1. Posner MI, Nissen MJ, Ogden WC. Attended and unattended processing modes: the role of set for spatial locations. In: Pick HL, Saltzman BJ, eds. Modes of perceiving and processing information. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1978.
2. James W. The principles of psychology, Vol. 1. New York: Henry Holt, 1890.
3. Rapcsak SZ, Verfaellie M, Fleet WS, Heilman KM. Selective attention in hemispatial neglect. Arch Neurol 1989;46(2):178-182.
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献