Author:
Hamedani Ali G.,Blank Leah,Thibault Dylan P.,Willis Allison W.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo determine the effect of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) to International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) coding transition on the point prevalence and longitudinal trends of 16 neurologic diagnoses.MethodsWe used 2014–2017 data from the National Inpatient Sample to identify hospitalizations with one of 16 common neurologic diagnoses. We used published ICD-9-CM codes to identify hospitalizations from January 1, 2014, to September 30, 2015, and used the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's MapIt tool to convert them to equivalent ICD-10-CM codes for October 1, 2015–December 31, 2017. We compared the prevalence of each diagnosis before vs after the ICD coding transition using logistic regression and used interrupted time series regression to model the longitudinal change in disease prevalence across time.ResultsThe average monthly prevalence of subarachnoid hemorrhage was stable before the coding transition (average monthly increase of 4.32 admissions, 99.7% confidence interval [CI]: −8.38 to 17.01) but increased after the coding transition (average monthly increase of 24.32 admissions, 99.7% CI: 15.71–32.93). Otherwise, there were no significant differences in the longitudinal rate of change in disease prevalence over time between ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM. Six of 16 neurologic diagnoses (37.5%) experienced significant changes in cross-sectional prevalence during the coding transition, most notably for status epilepticus (odds ratio 0.30, 99.7% CI: 0.26–0.34).ConclusionsThe transition from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM coding affects prevalence estimates for status epilepticus and other neurologic disorders, a potential source of bias for future longitudinal neurologic studies. Studies should limit to 1 coding system or use interrupted time series models to adjust for changes in coding patterns until new neurology-specific ICD-9 to ICD-10 conversion maps can be developed.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference21 articles.
1. Moore B , McDermott K , Elixhauser A . ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Coding in HCUP Data: Comparisons with ICD-9-CM and Precautions for Trend Analyses [Internet]. Rockville: U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2017. Available at: hcup-us.ahrq.gov/datainnovations/icd10_resources.jsp. Accessed September 18, 2019.
2. Early impact of the ICD-10-CM transition on selected health outcomes in 13 electronic health care databases in the United States;Panozzo;Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf,2018
3. Comparing chronic condition rates using ICD-9 and ICD-10 in VA patients FY2014-2016;Yoon;BMC Health Serv Res,2017
4. Trends in opioid-related inpatient stays shifted after the US transitioned to ICD-10-CM diagnosis coding in 2015;Heslin;Med Care,2017
5. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HCUP National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) [Internet]. Rockville: AHRQ; 2012. Available at: hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp. Accessed July 3, 2019.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献