Triggers for Referral to Specialized Palliative Care in Advanced Neurologic and Neurosurgical Conditions

Author:

McConvey Kayla,Kazazian Karnig,Iansavichene Alla E.ORCID,Jenkins Mary E.,Gofton Teneille Emma

Abstract

Background and ObjectivesTo systematically review the literature for the most suitable trigger criteria for referral to specialist palliative care services in life-limiting and life-threatening neurologic and neurosurgical conditions.MethodsLiterature searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE (1990–December 2020). To be included, studies must have trigger/referral criteria clearly outlined, a ≥75% nononcology neurosciences population, and consensus or guidelines documents regarding palliative neurosciences or trigger/referral criteria. We excluded studies that had an oncologic or non-neurosciences population as the main focus of study, trigger and referral criteria not clearly outlined, and no primary or duplicative data. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD4202013579), and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. The American Academy of NeurologyClinical Practice Guidelines Process Manualwas used to assess for risk of bias.ResultsOur search identified 1,748 publications, of which 22 articles met the eligibility criteria. Studies were considered in 2 main groups: (A) studies designed specifically to identify trigger criteria for referral to specialized neuropalliative care services (n = 9) and (B) studies that retrospectively reported the reason for referral to specialized palliative care or reflected a consensus statement among people with advanced neurologic illness (n = 13). Overall, the results suggest that several published referral triggers for specialized neuropalliative care are based on expert consensus. However, there is a growing body of literature providing evidence-based condition-specific triggers for multiple sclerosis, parkinsonism, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and dementia.DiscussionThere is a growing body of research that outlines evidence-based referral triggers for neuropalliative care. The ambiguity of nomenclature surrounding referral triggers in the current literature and field of neuropalliative care was a limitation to this study. We suggest that condition-specific triggers are likely to be the most effective for identifying the appropriate patients and timing for referral to specialist palliative care. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020135791,crd.york.ac.uk/prospero)

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical)

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Systematic Review of Palliative Care Needs in Young-Onset Dementia;Journal of the American Medical Directors Association;2024-10

2. Outcomes and Issues Addressed by Palliative Care in the Neurology Clinic;Seminars in Neurology;2024-07-31

3. Transition to end-of-life care in patients with neurological diseases in an acute hospital ward;BMC Neurology;2024-07-22

4. Pathways to Neuropalliative Care Practice;Seminars in Neurology;2024-07-02

5. Palliative Care Aspects in Multiple Sclerosis;Journal of Pain and Symptom Management;2024-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3