Author:
Kummer Benjamin R.,Sweetnam Chloe,Vickrey Barbara G.,Naasan Georges,Harvey Dayneen,Gallagher Kimberly,Jetté Nathalie
Abstract
ObjectiveTo assess the implementation of teleneurology (TN), including patient and clinician experiences, during the coronavirus respiratory disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.MethodsWe studied synchronous (video visit) and asynchronous (store-and-forward, patient-portal evaluation, remote monitoring) TN utilization in the Mount Sinai Health System Neurology Department in New York, 2 months before and after the start of our department's response to the pandemic in mid-March 2020. Weekly division meetings enabled ongoing assessments and analysis of barriers and facilitators according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change models. We used postvisit surveys of clinicians (from April 13 to May 15, 2020) and patients (from May 11 to 15, 2020) to determine technology platforms used, and TN experience and acceptability, using Likert scales (1 = very poor/unlikely to 5 = very good/likely).ResultsOver the 4-month period, 117 TN clinicians (n = 14 subspecialties) conducted 4,225 TN visits with 3,717 patients (52 pre- vs 4,173 post–COVID-19). No asynchronous TN services were delivered. Post–COVID-19, the number of TN clinicians, subspecialties performing TN, and visits increased by 963%, 133%, and 7,925%, respectively. Mean acceptability among patients and clinicians was 4.7 (SD 0.6) and 3.4 (SD 1.6), respectively. Most video visits were completed using Epic MyChart (78.5%) and Zoom (8.1%). TN implementation facilitators included Medicare geographic restriction waivers, development of clinician educational materials, and MyChart outreach programs for patients experiencing technical difficulties.ConclusionsA significant expansion of TN utilization accompanied the COVID-19 response. Patients found TN more acceptable than did clinicians. Proactive application of an implementation framework facilitated rapid and effective TN expansion.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference26 articles.
1. American telemedicine association: telestroke guidelines;Demaerschalk;Telemed J E Health,2017
2. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Physicians and other clinicians: CMS flexibilities to fight COVID19. Available at: cms.gov/files/document/covid-19-physicians-and-practitioners.pdf. Accessed June 17, 20.
3. Federation of State Medical Boards. U.S. States and Territories modifying requirements for telehealth in response to COVID-19. Available at: fsmb.org/siteassets/advocacy/pdf/states-waiving-licensure-requirements-for-telehealth-in-response-to-covid-19.pdf. Accessed June, 17, 2020.
4. COVID-19 is catalyzing the adoption of teleneurology;Klein;Neurology,2020
5. Telemedicine Quality and Outcomes in Stroke: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association