Red Desaturation Prevalence and Severity in Healthy Patients

Author:

Mikolajczyk Brian,Ritter Andrew,Larson Christian,Connett John,Olson Joshua,McClelland Collin,Lee Michael

Abstract

AbstractObjective:To determine the percentage of the healthy population that responds asymmetrically to the red desaturation test, and to approximate the degree of red desaturation in those individuals. We also sought to elucidate any correlation between demographic variables and red desaturation prevalence and severity.Methods:Adults aged 18 and older with a normal eye exam, including confrontation fields and best-corrected visual acuity of ≥ 20/25 OU, were eligible for this prevalence study. Those with objective or subjective afferent visual dysfunction were excluded. A total of 101 eligible participants (31.7% male; 77.2% white race; mean (SD) age: 41.5 (15.3) years) were queried whether monocular perception of redness of a standardized tropicamide bottle cap was the same and to estimate the interocular percentage difference, with one eye perceiving the bottle cap at “100% redness.”Results:Twenty-four participants (23.8%) experienced some degree of red desaturation. For these individuals with red desaturation, the average interocular difference was 9.0% (range 2-25%, 95% CI: 6.0-12.0%). There was no statistical evidence for a relationship between red desaturation and race, sex, or age.Conclusion:This study shows that nearly a quarter of healthy patients without apparent optic nerve or macular dysfunction may recognize red desaturation. This deserves consideration when interpreting red desaturation testing in patients suspected to have unilateral optic neuropathy. Further research with larger sample sizes may identify predictors of red desaturation in healthy patients, establish the red desaturation threshold separating pathologic from physiologic phenomena, and assess the repeatability of red desaturation over time in affected individuals.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical)

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3