Abstract
AbstractFor masonry structures in historical heritage with architecturally valuable features, such as frescoed surfaces, the application of structural reinforcement techniques appears to be very complex due to the requirements of removability and limited invasiveness. This is valid with reference to both traditional techniques and modern techniques, such as the external reinforcement with fibre-reinforced composite materials. In this scenario, the use of fibersreinforcedpolymers (FRPs) is drastically forbidden due to the use of epoxy-based matrix, which does not allow the removal of the intervention without damage of the substrate, even if the mechanical effectiveness of this system has been largely tested and proved. In fact, the reversibility is one of the most relevant aspects in the field of Heritage engineering. Thus, many efforts need to be spent in order to meet possible solutions, able to mitigate the risk, especially against seismic forces and other natural risks, while ensuring the conservation of the built heritage. This experimental research, which follows a first study on a smaller scale, aims to answer the question: how could a masonry column with frescoes and valuable surfaces be strengthened or repaired in a completely reversible manner?. Two strengthening methods were studied and are proposed herein by assuring the removability of the FRP-confinement of masonry columns. The first technique consists of a liquid adhesion inhibitor applied by brush before the hand lay-up installation of the FRP. The second is set by the interposition of a Mylar™ layer between the substrate and the FRP jacket. Uniaxial compression tests were performed in order to demonstrate the efficacy of the new strengthening techniques in increasing the axial strength (+ 39% and + 27% on average for the tuff- and limestone-based masonry, respectively) and displacement capacity (+ 32% and + 171% on average for the tuff- and limestone-based masonry, respectively) with respect to un-confined columns. Masonry columns FRP-confined with traditional wet lay-up were also tested for direct comparison. At a later moment, the FRP-jacket was removed to observe the substrate, which has been found effectively preserved from the adhesive, without any discoloration. The experimental results are extensively shown and discussed in the paper.
Funder
Università della Calabria
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Mechanics of Materials,General Materials Science,Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference30 articles.
1. Parisi F, Augenti N (2013) Earthquake damages to cultural heritage constructions and simplified assessment of artworks. Eng Fail Anal 34:735–760
2. ISTAT «Censimento generale della Popolazione e delle Abitazioni» 9 Ottobre 2011. [Online]. Available: http://dati-censimentopopolazione.istat.it/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=DICA_EDIFICIRES#. [Accessed on Mar 2022]
3. Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (2018) Nuove norme sismiche per il calcolo strutturale. Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Decreto Ministeriale del 17/01/2018. [In Italian]
4. Council of Europe recommendation of 1993 “On the protection of the architectura1 heritage against “natural disasters”, and especially the recommendation of the 1988 Skopje workshop
5. Rodwell D (2012) The UNESCO world heritage convention, 1972–2012: reflections and directions. Hist Environ Policy Pract 3(1):64–85
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献