Author:
Reyes Narváez Ronald Juven,Chávez Santos Máximo Florean,Yupanqui Sanchez Angel Ramiro,Tacuri Toribio Roberth Lozano,Campos Llana Miriam Esther,Escalante Aburto Antonio,Vergara Moncada Raúl Jesús,González Lucero Juan Roosevelt,Velásquez Ayma Álvaro,Humpire Castillo Jesús Efraín
Abstract
The study aimed to determine if there is a significant relationship between multiple intelligence and learning. For this reason, the research was carried out in higher education. The type of research is applied, being the level of descriptive and correlational research. The research was cross-sectional; since the survey was carried out only once using the technique of the questionnaire and notes. The sample is simple random 48 students. Naturalistic intelligence was shown to be at the highest level of 3.3750; while interpersonal and emotional is 3.3125, musical is 3.2917; and the lowest is Kinesthetic-Corporal is 3.0833 and the general average is 3.2176. Therefore, multiple intelligences improve student learning; however, it is necessary that teachers take into account in their classes the naturalistic, interpersonal and emotional intelligences are the most representative. It was determined that more than 50% of the respondents are located at 3,0000, since the maximum is five, then it is favorable. Likewise, the most repeated times is 3.00 Likewise, 1.14854 scale units deviate from the average, because it is low it induces less data dispersion. Therefore, it is used in learning the multiple intelligences of the students. Finally, the calculated p value is 0.000, which is less than 0.01 (0.000< 0.001), so the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is accepted. The rho coefficient is 0.852, which indicates that the relationship between the variables is direct and its degree is very high. In conclusion: It can be stated with 99% confidence that there is a very high positive relationship between the degree of multiple intelligences and the learning of university students.
Publisher
Centro de Investigacion y Capacitacion para el Desarrollo Regional (CINCADER)
Reference14 articles.
1. Arias Gallegos, W. L., & Linares Pomareda de Bocchio, G. M. (2018). Inteligencias múltiples y estrategias metacognitivas en profesores universitarios. Perspectiva Educacional, 57(1), 120-140. https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0718-97292018000100120&script=sci_arttext
2. Calisaya, et al., 2022. Inteligencias múltiples y competencias básicas en educación universitaria. Horizontes Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación, 6(24), 1010-1022. http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?pid=S2616-79642022000301010&script=sci_arttext
3. Cardozo, et al., 2018. Identificación de los Estilos de Aprendizaje: Estudiantes universitarios de entrenamiento deportivo de jornadas diurna y nocturna. Educación Física y Ciencia, 20(4), 3-4. http://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/efyc/v20n4/2314-2561-efyc-20-4-e060.pdf
4. Durán, et al., 2014. Validación del inventario de autoeficacia para inteligencias múltiples revisado (IAMI-R) en una muestra de estudiantes universitarios venezolanos. Actualidades investigativas en Educación. pp.1-23. https://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?pid=S1409-47032014000200015&script=sci_arttext
5. Fraile Antonio, López-Pastor Víctor, Castejón Javier y Romero Rosario. 2013. La evaluación formativa en docencia universitaria y el rendimiento académico del alumnado. Aula abierta, 41(2), 23-34. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/4239063.pdf