The relationship between pharmacy licensing policies on clinical training (CT) and success rates for international pharmacists (IPs) within Canada, United Kingdom, and the United States: A comparative policy analysis

Author:

Al-Azzawi AmadORCID

Abstract

Introduction: In October 2018, the Pharmacy Examining Board of Canada released a report showing that only 41.1% of international pharmacists pass the Pharmacy Qualifying Examination, compared to 91% of Canadian graduates. When compared to the United Kingdom and United States, Canada has the lowest success rates for the integration of international pharmacists. Aim: This study aims to address two questions: What are the professional pharmacy policies governing the clinical training resources for international pharmacists within their host country? What can Canada learn from other Western countries to facilitate the integration of international pharmacists? Method: A comparative policy analysis was used to draw comparisons between Canada’s regulatory policies governing the pharmacy license to other similar models in the United Kingdom and United States. Results: Upon examining current integration systems in these countries, differences in training period requirements and competencies became apparent. Therefore, the findings suggest that Canadian stakeholders can learn from other models’ legislation, structure, and clinical outcome prospects.

Publisher

International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP)

Subject

Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacy,Education

Reference58 articles.

1. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE). (2007). Standards 2007 Self-Study Guide. Available at: https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/S2007Guidelines2.0_ChangesIdentifiedInRed.pdf

2. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. (ACPE). (2006). Accreditation Standards and Guidelines for the Professional Programme in Pharmacy Leading to the Doctor of Pharmacy Degree. Available at: https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/Standards2016FINAL.pdf

3. American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP). (2004). Educational Outcomes 2004. Available at: https://www.aacp.org/sites/default/files/2017-11/Combined-CAPE-2004-Supplemential-Educational-Outcomes.pdf

4. American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP). (2020). Who we are. Available at: https://www.aacp.org/article/who-we-are

5. American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy(AACP). (2010). Annual Report. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Volume 74, Issue 10, Article S3 https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7410S3

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3