The Course of Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome after Ultrasound-Guided Injections

Author:

Atesok Kivanc1,Pierce Jennifer1,Small Benjamin1,Perumal Venkat1,Cooper Truitt1,Park Joseph1

Affiliation:

1. University of Virginia

Abstract

BACKGROUND Local ultrasound (US)-guided injections of anesthetics with corticosteroids are commonly performed for the conservative treatment of tarsal tunnel syndrome (TTS). OBJECTIVE This retrospective study aimed to investigate the outcomes of TTS after US-guided injections. METHODS The study included patients who were diagnosed with TTS and received US-guided injections as part of their initial treatment. The pain levels were noted on a scale between zero and ten before and after each injection. The patients were divided into non-surgical and surgical groups. The nonsurgical group included patients who had received US-guided injections and did not proceed to surgical treatment, and the surgical group included those who received US-guided injections and ultimately underwent tarsal tunnel release (TTR). The two groups were compared in terms of age, post-injection follow-up time, and the amount of pain reduction immediately after injection (ΔPN). In the surgical group, outcomes of surgical treatment were also assessed. RESULTS A total of 218 patients were diagnosed with TTS and received US-guided injections. After the injections, 169 patients (77.5%) did not go on to TTR (nonsurgical group) and 49 patients (22.5%) underwent TTR (surgical group). The average ages for the nonsurgical and surgical groups were 53.8 and 48.9 years (P = 0.03). The average time between the injection and final follow-up for the nonsurgical group was 339 days. The average time between the injection and TTR for the surgical group was 145 days. There were no differences in pain relief after the injections between the nonsurgical and surgical groups (mean ΔPN: 3.6 and 3.8, respectively). The average post-surgical follow-up time was 117 days. At final follow-up, 41 patients (84%) in the surgical group had complete resolution of pain and neurological symptoms. CONCLUSION US-guided injection can be an effective conservative treatment option for patients with TTS. Younger patients may be more likely to proceed to TTR. Level of Evidence Level III

Publisher

Open Medical Publishing

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Reference18 articles.

1. Imaging of nerve entrapment in the foot and ankle;Robert Lopez-Ben;Foot and Ankle Clinics,2011

2. Tarsal tunnel syndrome—A narrative literature review;Simon C. McSweeney;The Foot,2015

3. Clinical and electrophysiological findings and follow-up in tarsal tunnel syndrome;M Mondelli;Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control,1998

4. Usefulness of electrodiagnostic techniques in the evaluation of suspected tarsal tunnel syndrome: An evidence-based review;Atul T. Patel;Muscle & Nerve,2005

5. Clinical results after tarsal tunnel decompression.;W H Pfeiffer;The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery,1994

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3