Abstract
Feature mode decomposition (FMD) has advantages over the other newer time-frequency methods such as ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) and variational mode decomposition (VMD) in single channel blind source separation (SCBSS). However, FMD has the defect of needing to determine the precise number of fault sources manually. To solve the above defect of FMD, an adaptive method for determining the number of fault sources based on the shift invariant sparse code (SISC) is proposed. SISC was used to train a set of basis functions from the single channel signal, and the corresponding potential components were reconstructed firstly. Subsequently, the structural similarity of these potential components was used for clustering, and each of the obtained clustering signals represented one kind of fault. Then the number of clustering was determined by minimizing the structural correlation among the clustering signals. It was considered that the source separation had achieved the best effect when the structural difference among the clusters was the largest, and the number of clustering at this time was used as the optimal estimated value, which was used as the modal inputs number of FMD calculation model to realize SCBSS of rolling bearing. Simulation and experimental analysis were carried out to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, and its superiority was also verified through comparison.
Reference27 articles.
1. P. C. Jena, D. R. Parhi, and G. Pohit, “Dynamic investigation of FRP cracked beam using neural network technique,” Journal of Vibration Engineering and Technologies, Vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 647–661, Jul. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00158-5
2. P. P. Sarada, P. C. Jena, and R. R. Dash, “Dynamic analysis of laminated composite beam using Timoshenko beam theory,” International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 190–196, Aug. 2019.
3. S. P. Parida and P. C. Jena, “Selective layer-by-layer fillering and its effect on the dynamic response of laminated composite plates using higher-order theory,” Journal of Vibration and Control, Vol. 29, No. 11-12, pp. 2473–2488, Apr. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1177/10775463221081180
4. S. P. Parida, P. C. Jena, S. R. Das, D. Dhupal, and R. R. Dash, “Comparative stress analysis of different suitable biomaterials for artificial hip joint and femur bone using finite element simulation,” Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies, Vol. 8, No. sup3, pp. 1741–1756, Oct. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068x.2021.1949541
5. Pankaj Charan, Dayal R. Parhi, and G. Pohit, “Theoretical, numerical (FEM) and experimental analysis of composite cracked beams of different boundary conditions using vibration mode shape curvatures,” International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 509–518, May 2014.