Abstract
Micro-rhinic Dysplasia is a common finding in patients who seek for dentofacial correction have several degrees of facial growth commitment and can be associated with another growth syndromes like the Rotation Syndrome, for instance, which may increase the degree of difficulty in corrective treatment of malocclusion. The most challenging malocclusion treatment in an individual with Micro-rhinic Dysplasia is the anterior open bite, mostly when associated with prognathism. The aim of this manuscript is to show through patients records the clinical and cephalometric characteristics of Micro-rhinic Dysplasia alone or associated with other craniofacial growth alterations and their consequences in malocclusion treatment.
Reference3 articles.
1. H. P. Bimler, “Die bedeutung des fernröntgenbildes,” Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 256–273, Sep. 1959, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02286320
2. H. P. Bimler, “Some thoughts about orthodontics and TMJ troubles,” The Functional Orthodontist, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 21–24, 2000.
3. H. P. Bimler, “The Bimler Appliance,” in Removable Orthodontic Appliances, London, 1977.