Affiliation:
1. Independent Researcher, Kampala, Uganda
Abstract
The generation of health service delivery data in middle- and low-income countries typically relies on health facility surveys and routine health monitoring data. Previous studies on antenatal care (ANC) service delivery have not employed measurement parameters that accurately and cost-effectively encompass various aspects of ANC service availability, content, and organization. This study aimed to assess the agreement level between the Service Level Index (SLI) tool, which measures ANC service provision, and a standard Service Provision Assessment tool. The SLI tool integrates pertinent sub-domains relevant to ANC service provision processes at the health facility level, employing selected key elements from these sub-domains as proxy measures. This approach minimizes the complexities associated with the time and effort required for assessing service delivery comprehensively.
The study examined the agreement between the Service Level Index tool and the ANC module of the MEASURE/DHS Service Provision Assessment tool. To accomplish this, the results obtained from the service level index measurement for each health facility were compared with the outcomes derived from the MEASURE/DHS Service Provision Assessment tool. Statistical analysis using the Bland-Altman method was employed to ascertain the significance of differences between measurements obtained from the Service Level Index tool and the Service Provision Assessment tool. The estimated mean difference (d) and standard deviation (sd) were 0.1 and 0.507, respectively.
The agreement level between the two tools (-1.19 to 1.46) indicated that, for 95% of observations, the scoring of ANC service provision conducted using the SLI tool deviated between 1.19% lower and 1.46% higher than the scores generated by the reference tool. The results revealed that the Service Level Index tool has the potential to serve as an alternative to the ANC module of the standard Service Provision Assessment tool for evaluating ANC services at the micro-level.
Publisher
Asploro Open Access Publications
Subject
General Medicine,General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science,General Medicine,General Medicine,General Medicine,Education,Communication,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference17 articles.
1. Hozumi D, Fronczak N, Minichiello SN, Buckner B, Fapohunda B, Kombe G, Searing H, Ramarao S, Ricca J. Profiles of Health Facility Assessment Methods. United States: Report of the International Health Facility Assessment Network (IHFAN), Measure Evaluation, USAID; 2008. Available from: https://www.measureevaluation.org/resources/publications/tr-06-36/
2. Donabedian A. Aspects of Medical Care Administration. Boston: Harvard University Press; 1973.
3. Dutton DB. Explaining the low use of health services by the poor: costs, attitudes, or delivery systems? Am Sociol Rev. 1978 Jun;43(3):348-68. [PMID: 686535]
4. Paxton A, Bailey P, Lobis S, Fry D. Global patterns in availability of emergency obstetric care. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2006 Jun 1;93(3):300-307.
5. World Health Organization. Standards for improving quality of care for maternal and new born care in health facilities. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2016. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/249155/9789241511216-eng.pdf