The journey into inquiry land in Tennessee: How to get there from anywhere? Lessons learned over 25 years

Author:

Gibson Michael,Byerly, Jr Don

Abstract

Driven by changes in the National Standards during the 1990s, inquiry became the pedagogical methodology of choice for K-12 sciences as a major paradigm shift. Inquiry was chosen because it realistically and accurately modeled how scientists conduct scientific studies. Scientific inquiry is itself a learning process, and early educational research suggested that students learned more efficiently through inquiry. However, inquiry was a difficult pedagogy for teachers to learn and for students to experience, as it appears chaotic and decentralized. K-12 Earth science in Tennessee was in need of revitalization, in terms of shifting to the new Earth systems curriculum and incorporating inquiry as the pedagogy of delivery. To tackle both problems in tandem, the authors collaborated with the Tennessee Department of Education, Tennessee Science Teachers Association, and Tennessee Earth Science Teachers (TEST) to develop a series of Earth science professional development opportunities in which inquiry was modeled as the pedagogical vehicle and content was organized into Earth systems. We provide an anecdotal before-and-after perspective that spans 25 years of experiential lessons the workshop leaders learned about the “journey into inquiry land” from any other pedagogy. These lessons, applicable to all sciences, serve as the cornerstone to teaching inquiry to new teachers, as well as to seasoned veteran teachers making the switch to the inquiry-driven classroom.

Publisher

The Society of Sigma Gamma Epsilon

Reference47 articles.

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1993, Project 2061: Science for all Americans: Benchmarks for science literacy, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 133 p.

2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2013, Atlas of science, Volumes 1 and 2: Mapping K-12 science learning: Washington, D.C., https://www.project2061.org/publications/atlas/default.htm (accessed July 1, 2024).

3. American Geological Institute (AGI), 1991, Earth science contents guidelines grades K-12: American Geological Institute, Alexandria, VA, 76 p.

4. Bailey, G.L., Skinner, J.A., Byerly, D.W., Gibson, M.A., and Prather, P.J., 1999, Thematic earth science at the secondary level-an interdisciplinary approach: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 31, No. 7, p. A-212.

5. Beatrice F., Birman, B.F., Boyle, A., Le Floch, K.C., Elledge, A., Holtzman, D., Song, M., Thomsen, K., Walters, K., and Yoon, K-S., 2009, State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act, Volume VIII-Teacher Quality Under NCLB: Final Report: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service, State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act, Volume VIII-Teacher Quality Under NCLB: Final Report, Washington, D.C., 2009, 243 p.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The history of the Tennessee Earth Science Teachers (TEST);The Compass: Earth Science Journal of Sigma Gamma Epsilon;2024-10-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3