Art for democracy’s sake: How neo-McCarthyism is resisted by arts-based social movements

Author:

Duke Benjamin1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ISNI: 0000000419368411 University of Leicester

Abstract

The rise of neo-McCarthyism has strengthened the power of the state through the repressive use of public institutions. Those who challenge capitalism and authoritarianism are singled out for reprisal. Arts-based social movements can resist state-sponsored neo-McCarthyite sanctions against democracy. Social movement activists can provide counter-narratives to the emerging forms of anti-leftism in autocratic states. As a model of resistance, travelling art and theatre groups could operate on a collaborative, crowdfunded basis, moving from place to place and providing innovative alternatives to the status quo. They would present comedy sketches, monologues, oratory, parodies, poetry, satires and songs that have a social and political message. They would at the same time disseminate information to help people make effective use of available resources and connect with solidarity networks. Performances could be live-streamed or recorded, then uploaded onto various social media platforms, helping to promote social movement objectives. Due to the collaborative nature of the work, public support would grow for these arts troupes that would eventually become self-funded. As social movement projects move online, artists encounter new forms of neo-McCarthyite repression.

Publisher

Intellect

Reference62 articles.

1. Alexandersson, B. O. P. and Jónsson, G. H. (2021), ‘Key witness in Assange case jailed in Iceland after admitting to lies and ongoing crime spree’, Heimildin, 6 October, https://heimildin.is/grein/14117/. Accessed 29 September 2023.

2. Can creative cities be inclusive too? How do Dubai, Amsterdam and Toronto navigate the tensions between creativity and inclusiveness in their adoptions of city brands and policy initiatives?;Cities,2022

3. Radical social innovation and the spatialities of grassroots activism: Navigating pathways for tackling inequality and reinventing the commons;Journal of Political Ecology,2022

4. (De)futuring democracy: Labs, playgrounds and ateliers as democratic innovations;Futures,2021

5. Losing the freedom to be human;Columbia Human Rights Law Review,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3