Affiliation:
1. ISNI: 0000000404102071 University of Helsinki
Abstract
Through a discussion of three YouTube vlogs by trans men, I am suggesting that the seemingly simple division between men who have penises (cis) and men who do not (trans) – as long as genital surgery has not been obtained – is materially more muddled than generally culturally considered, as well as to a great extent discursively created and maintained. Instead of understanding trans men’s bodies through lack and deficiency, I consider the trans penis as a part of body-reflexive practices of masculinity, a significant part of building one’s trans male self. I am thus arguing for a change in how we understand what a penis is, or what counts as a penis, as well as in how we see and understand trans men’s bodies.
Funder
Research Council of Finland
Kone Foundation
Subject
Visual Arts and Performing Arts,Communication
Reference40 articles.
1. What does it mean to be a man? Trans masculinities, bodily practices, and reflexive embodiment;Men and Masculinities,2022
2. Asher, Charles (2014), ‘FTM: Penetrative sex with women’, YouTube, 10 December, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F57g3zOIe7M. Accessed 10 November 2019.
3. Trapped in the wrong theory: Rethinking trans oppression and resistance;Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,2014
4. The penis in the medical imagination,2022
5. Size matters: Experiences of atypical genital and sexual development in males;Journal of Health Psychology,2005