Affiliation:
1. 0000000123146254Tampere University
Abstract
The concept of media welfare state is a combination of the democratic corporatist media system and social democratic welfare state model, describing the distinctiveness of the Nordic countries and their media systems with four basic principles. Media welfare state is based on communication
services understood as public goods, freedom from editorial interference, cultural policy and economic support for media pluralism as well as preference for consensual solutions involving cooperation between main stakeholders. However, identifying a joint media welfare state model in recent
media and communication policy decisions made in Nordic countries on developing communication infrastructures, media delivery and universal access turns out to be difficult. During the last three decades, none of the four largest Nordic countries has strictly followed all the four principles.
In most cases, Finland has ended up with different solutions than its Nordic neighbours and sometimes also in contradiction with the Media Welfare State model. There is evidence that the Nordic media markets have been losing their distinguishability over the years. But the main reason why
the present-day Nordic countries do not fit into media welfare state model is that they no longer are welfare states ‐ not at least in the same fashion as they used to be. In Finland, this transition from the welfare state to the competition state has been more rapid and extensive than
elsewhere in the Nordic region, partly because of its geopolitical position. The Finnish economy has also been exceptionally dependent on a single mobile technology corporation.
Reference56 articles.
1. Social obsolescence of the TV fee and the financial crisis of Finnish public service media;Journal of Media Business Studies,2012
2. Why did TV bits and radio bits not fit together? Digitalization and divergence of broadcast media,2016
3. Who’s afraid of a Pan-European spectrum policy? The EU and the battles over the UHF broadcast band;International Journal of Communication,2018
4. Suunnittelutaloudesta kilpailutalouteen: Miten muutos oli ideologisesti mahdollinen?’ (‘From planned economy to competition economy: How was the change ideologically possible?’);Yhteiskuntapolitiikka,2004
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献