The meaning of the mask: Ambivalent social identity and mask refusal in COVID America

Author:

Kealy-Morris Elizabeth1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ISNI: 0000000107905329 Manchester Metropolitan University

Abstract

This article will consider the medical face mask as both an accessory and a protective barrier utilizing embodied dress theory. The face mask is now a symbol of ambivalent social identity, and centrally, the anxiety of who the mask is protecting – who is the ‘sick one’ here? This anxiety turned to powerful backlash against this small, but key piece of the personal protective equipment (PPE) and against public health mandates ruling masks must be worn in certain settings. This article will examine the mask-refusal movement in the United States to unpick the roots of this backlash, breaking new ground through utilizing key studies on cultural memory in America to propose that its origins come from an active belief in the ‘rugged individualism’ of the American psyche borne from the myth of the frontier spirit which runs through American collective consciousness underpinned by masculine ideologies. This article will suggest that with the reaction to the face mask, we see further evidence that dressing oneself is an everyday embodied practice which has high stakes during a deadly global pandemic. The article suggests practices and activities that fashion and dress scholars could engage in to actively use embodied dress theory in the future research to develop public health policies based on solidarity and empathy and design masks we will want to wear.

Publisher

Intellect

Reference85 articles.

1. Governor partisanship explains the adoption of statewide mask mandates in response to COVID-19;State Politics and Policy Quarterly,2022

2. Alfonso lll, Fernando (2020), ‘Why some people of color say they won’t wear homemade masks’, CNN, 7 April, https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/07/us/face-masks-ethnicity-coronavirus-cdc-trnd/index.html. Accessed 9 May 2024.

3. American Psychological Association, Boys and Men Guidelines Group (2018), ‘APA guidelines for psychological practice with boys and men’, August, http://www.apa.org/about/policy/psychological-practice-boys-men-guidelines.pdf. Accessed 25 April 2024.

4. Frontier culture: The roots and persistence of “rugged individualism” in the United States;Econometrica,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3