Affiliation:
1. ISNI: 0000000121510999 University of Arkansas
2. ISNI: 0000000107277545 University of Alabama
3. ISNI: 0000000405302673 University of North Georgia
Abstract
During the 2016 US presidential primary debate cycle, CBS displayed tweets alongside presidential candidates on-screen. Using the elaboration likelihood model and social identity theory, the current study reveals the incorporation of Twitter comments and metrics may have hindered normative outcomes of debate viewing. A mixed-method approach consisting of content analysis and an eye-tracking intervention was used to understand the effects of including socially networked information in televised debates. Findings show that including information from social media on-screen appeared to displace elaborative energy, limiting what viewers learned about candidate policies, and leaving them feeling disillusioned about politics. Polarization seemed to increase, while viewing tweets on-screen also related to being less persuaded by candidates. The inclusion of on-screen social media visuals during televised debates may overwhelm the viewer’s ability to process and retain democratic information.
Reference81 articles.
1. Unintended consequences of spatial presence on learning in virtual reality;Computers & Education,2022
2. A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing U.S. presidential debates;Communication Monographs,2003
3. Effects of watching primary debates in the 2000 U.S. presidential campaign;Journal of Communication,2002
4. How attention partitions itself during simultaneous message presentations;Human Communication Research,2005
5. Inferring mindful cognitive-processing of peer-feedback via eye-tracking: Role of feedback characteristics, fixation-durations and transitions;Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,2014