Visual overload: The influence of broadcast social media visuals on televised debate viewing outcomes

Author:

Jennings Freddie J.1ORCID,Bouchillon Brandon1ORCID,Bramlett Josh C.2ORCID,Eubanks Austin D.1ORCID,Stewart Patrick A.1ORCID,Miller Jason M.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ISNI: 0000000121510999 University of Arkansas

2. ISNI: 0000000107277545 University of Alabama

3. ISNI: 0000000405302673 University of North Georgia

Abstract

During the 2016 US presidential primary debate cycle, CBS displayed tweets alongside presidential candidates on-screen. Using the elaboration likelihood model and social identity theory, the current study reveals the incorporation of Twitter comments and metrics may have hindered normative outcomes of debate viewing. A mixed-method approach consisting of content analysis and an eye-tracking intervention was used to understand the effects of including socially networked information in televised debates. Findings show that including information from social media on-screen appeared to displace elaborative energy, limiting what viewers learned about candidate policies, and leaving them feeling disillusioned about politics. Polarization seemed to increase, while viewing tweets on-screen also related to being less persuaded by candidates. The inclusion of on-screen social media visuals during televised debates may overwhelm the viewer’s ability to process and retain democratic information.

Publisher

Intellect

Reference81 articles.

1. Unintended consequences of spatial presence on learning in virtual reality;Computers & Education,2022

2. A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing U.S. presidential debates;Communication Monographs,2003

3. Effects of watching primary debates in the 2000 U.S. presidential campaign;Journal of Communication,2002

4. How attention partitions itself during simultaneous message presentations;Human Communication Research,2005

5. Inferring mindful cognitive-processing of peer-feedback via eye-tracking: Role of feedback characteristics, fixation-durations and transitions;Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3