Affiliation:
1. Umeå Institute of Design
Abstract
An intriguing aspect of the notion of research through design is how much we seem to gain from its proposition and how informative it appears to be, even as we do not state precisely what is meant by the terms research or design. But, what is it that this notion of through
calls to the foreground? In what follows, I discuss three interpretations of what through might refer to by looking at it from different perspectives: through practice, through making and through judgement. Different perspectives bring different possibilities to the foreground,
and therefore they also suggest slightly different future trajectories. But this also means that some issues fade into the background, something new perspectives can help us get a glimpse of. This is perhaps especially evident in the case of judgement, the least familiar of the three. Looking
across the range of research trajectories that these three perspectives open up, there are reasons to think that we can make research through design become a more extensive, inclusive and a far more radical research proposition than its name reveals.
Subject
Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Visual Arts and Performing Arts
Reference25 articles.
1. Design as a discipline;Design Studies,1979
2. The nature of research;Co-design: Interdisciplinary Journal of Design,1995
3. Understanding and politics (The difficulties of understanding),[1954] 1994
4. The production of knowledge in artistic research,2010
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献