Breaking for gold: Who can judge me?

Abstract

Despite the central importance of judging in breaking competition, little quantitative research on how different people judge and score breaking battles has yet been done. This article explores variables that potentially influence performance evaluation. Statistical analyses of survey data show how these variables can affect battle results. Findings concerning adjudicator certification application vetting and course teaching recommend to not discriminate by applicant veterancy yet focus on thorough curricula, customized per country. More judge certification course time should also focus on the proper comprehension of performances’ interpretative and artistic qualities. The final exam should be what defines who can be a good judge. Implications reach as far as education for the Olympic competition audience. Such curricula can use videos as described herein. Suggestions for further study are also discussed.