Revisiting sectarianism in Iraq: Changing attitudes of Sunnis and Shias towards voting, social trust and government

Author:

Ahmed Raed1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ISNI: 000000046023831X Al-Iraqia University

Abstract

After 2003, Iraq experienced political, social and violent sectarianism. Scholars who studied sectarianism in Iraq tried to explain it through events, narratives and official statements. However, it has not been possible to understand the impact of the sectarian identity of Sunnis and Shias on their political and social behaviour. This study aims to measure that impact by asking: how has sectarianism changed in Iraq over time from the perspective of public opinion – increase or decrease, and why? For a deeper understanding, some demographic factors, such as age, education and gender, are considered to measure how the sectarian identity has affected the behaviour of Iraqis in voting, interpersonal trust, and trusting the government and the army. By using the surveys conducted by the Arab Barometer from 2011 to 2022, it was possible to compare the responses of the public by sect and have interesting findings. In general, Sunnis and Shias have exchanged their roles after 2013. Until 2013, Shias had tended to vote and trust local and national governments more than Sunnis. However, since 2019, the surveys show that Sunnis have had greater rates of voting and trust those governments than the Shias. Also, since 2019, the interpersonal trust between Sunnis and Shias has improved more than before, which can support the social cohesion between people who belong to different sects.

Publisher

Intellect

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities

Reference35 articles.

1. Majorities and minorities in post-ISIS Iraq;Contemporary Arab Affairs,2016

2. Mausoat al-Sysa (‘The encyclopedia of politics’),2003

3. Iraq 2014: Making sense of sectarian violence;International Journal of Contemporary Iraqi Studies,2017

4. Al-Qarawee, Harith (2014), ‘Iraq’s sectarian crisis: A legacy of exclusion’, Carnegie Middle East Center, April, https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep12876.pdf?acceptTC=true&coverpage=false&addFooter=false. Accessed 21 September 2022.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3