Abstract
The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), a popular and widely used measurement tool in cross-cultural research, evaluates
life satisfaction. Even though numerous studies have demonstrated factorial validity across a range of samples and
cultures, the topic of factorial invariance across various subgroups is still up for debate. There are inconsistencies
regarding the structure of the life satisfaction scale in descriptive and relational studies. This study aimed to combine
these contentious models' (Model 1: single-factor model, Model 2: modified single-factor model and Model 3: twofactor
model) measurement invariance with the findings of Multi Group Confirmatory Factor Analyses (MGCFA) carried
out among various gender subgroups in Turkish culture with a sample of 690 participants. As a result of the research, all
models met the model data goodness of fit according to the gender subgroup. But measurement-invariance decisions
carried out according to different models differed.
Reference63 articles.
1. Life Satisfaction in Urban China: Components and Determinants
2. Arrindell, W. A., Heesink, J., & Feij, J. A. (1999). The
satisfaction with life scale (SWLS): Appraisal with 1700
healthy young adults in The Netherlands. Personality and
Individual Differences, 26(5), 815-826.
3. Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & Garcı’a-Merita, M. L.
(2003). Satisfaction with life scale: Analysis of factorial
invariance across sexes. Personality and Individual
Differences, 35(6), 1255-1260.
4. The Psychometric Evaluation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale Using a Nationally Representative Sample of China
5. Başusta, N.B., & Gelbal, S. (2015). Testing
measurement invariance in intergroup comparisons: PISA
student survey example. Hacettepe University Faculty of
Education Journal, 30 (4), 80-90.