Abstract
Previous research has addressed how social workers use the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). These studies have treated psychiatric diagnosis as a single entity, assuming that attitude and use of the taxonomy are uniform across diagnostic categories. However, the 30 clinical social workers who took part in this qualitative study reported that salience and utility of DSM diagnoses vary according to type and severity of the disorder, playing a greater role for more severe conditions and affecting both treatment and the therapeutic relationship. They distinguished between thinking diagnostically and using the DSM, and considered symptoms a more useful analytic focus than psychiatric categories. Findings cover 7 thematic areas, with implications for social work practice, policy, and research.
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Psychologist attitudes toward DSM-5 and its alternatives.;Professional Psychology: Research and Practice;2022-12
2. A Centennial of Mary Richmond’sSocial Diagnosis: A Celebration and Contemporary Assessment of a Seminal Work;Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services;2019-07
3. DSM-5: Do Counselors Really Want an Alternative?;Journal of Humanistic Psychology;2017-03-08
4. DSM-5: Do Psychologists Really Want an Alternative?;Journal of Humanistic Psychology;2016-07-27
5. Why This Book Is Needed;Critical Thinking in Clinical Assessment and Diagnosis;2015