Is Constituent Feedback Living up to Its Promise? Provider Perceptions of Feedback Practices in Nonprofit Human Service Organizations

Author:

Campbell David A.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Administration, Binghamton University. Earlier in his career, he served as a senior manager in Alliance for Children and Families’ member agencies in New York City and Cleveland.

Abstract

In recent years, leaders of nonprofit human service organizations and their funders have made a significant investment in systematic data collection and analysis to analyze program activities. Using data gathered from a survey and 5 focus groups of members of a national organization of human service providers, this study evaluates providers’ perceptions of the practices they use to gather feedback from service beneficiaries and other stakeholders. The study developed a 6-element framework of feedback purposes to frame current practices. The study found that providers are actively engaged in feedback activities but are dissatisfied with their efforts, attributable to disagreements over the purpose of feedback, concerns over the value of data collection instruments, and the lack of organizational capacity.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Driving and evaluating social impact in health marketing;Health Marketing Quarterly;2024-04-02

2. Participants not Observers: Involving Beneficiaries as Co-assessors in Performance Analysis;Journal of Health and Human Services Administration;2022-12

3. What Sector Do Consumers Prefer for the Delivery of ‘Public’ Services? A Comparative Analysis of the US and China;Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs;2022-03-28

4. From Motives to Actions: A Study of Citizen Engagement in Health and Human Service Contracts;International Journal of Public Administration;2019-10-08

5. Program Performance and Multiple Constituency Theory;Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly;2014-12-23

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3