THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SIZE AND LOCALIZATION OF THE URETERAL STONE AND THE DEGREE OF HYDRONEPHROSIS
Author:
AKÇİÇEK Mehmet1ORCID, BUĞDAY Muhammet Serdar2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. MALATYA TURGUT ÖZAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, DAHİLİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, RADYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI 2. MALATYA TURGUT OZAL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF SURGICAL MEDICAL SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF UROLOGY
Abstract
The aim of our research is to evaluate whether there is a relationship between the degree of hydronephrosis and, the size and location of the stones in the ureter in patients with ureteral stones, with computed tomography (CT). 105 patients who applied to Malatya Training and Research Hospital with the complaint of renal colic and underwent CT scan were included in the study. Hydronephrosis was evaluated by using the system developed by the Society of Fetal Urology. Stone sizes were grouped as <5 mm, 5 – 10 mm, and ≥ 10 mm. The location of the stones were indicated as proximal - middle - distal according to the anatomical parts of the ureters. 61 (58.1%) patients had stones in the distal ureter, 20 (19%) had stones in the middle ureter, and 24 (22.9%) had stones in the proximal ureter. It was determined that the stone size showed significant difference according to the degree of hydronephrosis (p<0.05). There was no significant relationship between the stone location being in the proximal, middle or distal parts of the ureter and the degree of hydronephrosis (p=0.241). While, as the size of ureteral stones increases the degree of hydronephrosis increases, there is no relation with the location of the stone and hydronephrosis.
Publisher
Inonu University
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference29 articles.
1. Ahmed, A. F., Gabr, A. H., Emara, A. A., Ali, M., Abdel-Aziz, A. S. & Alshahrani, S. (2015). Factors predicting the spontaneous passage of a ureteric calculus of ⩽10 mm. Arab Journal of Urology, 13(2), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2014.11.004 2. Aune, D., Mahamat-Saleh, Y., Norat, T. & Riboli, E. (2018). Body fatness, diabetes, physical activity and risk of kidney stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. European Journal of Epidemiology, 33(11), 1033–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0426-4 3. Bihl, Geoffrey & Anthony Meyers. (2001). Recurrent renal stone disease—advances in pathogenesis and clinical management. The Lancet, 358(9282), 651–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05782-8 4. Brown, Jeremy. (2006). Diagnostic and treatment patterns for renal colic in US emergency departments. International Urology and Nephrology, 38(1), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-005-3622-6 5. Daga, S., Wagaskar, V. G., Tanwar, H., Shelke, U., Patil, B. & Patwardhan, S. (2016). efficacy of medical expulsive therapy in renal calculi less than or equal to 5 millimetres in size. Urology Journal, 13(6), 2893–2898. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v13i6.3563
|
|