Relative Human Rights in the Context of Special Legal Regimes

Author:

Hetman Yevhen1,Mernyk Anastasiia2,Shapoval Roman3

Affiliation:

1. National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine

2. Department of Theory and Philosophy of Law Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

3. Department of Administrative Law and Administrative Activities Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

Abstract

The article examines the human rights that may be limited in conditions of emergency and martial law, which is relevant in modern conditions, based on the presence of local military conflicts, states of emergency or the possibility of their existence in many countries. The purpose of the work is to clarify the main features of different types of human rights that are subject to restrictions in special legal situations, highlight the specific violations by public authorities and local governments in the application of certain types of restrictions. To achieve this goal, the work uses a system of methods of scientific knowledge, including general, private, and special legal. The practical value of the study lies in the implementation of classifications of human rights on the criterion of the possibility of their restriction in the context of special legal regimes. Thus, during the operation of special legal regimes, the following human and civil rights may be temporarily restricted: the right to liberty and security of person, the right to housing, the right to privacy, the right to private and family life, freedom of movement, freedom of thought, freedom to freely express one's views and beliefs, the right to participate in referendums, the right to vote and to be elected, the right to peaceful assembly, the right to property, the right to work and freedom of entrepreneurial activity, the right to education, the right to personal data protection. It is concluded that in the conditions of special legal regimes there is a large number of human rights, which are relations, not absolute, and may be limited by the state and its bodies, local authorities. However, in order for such restrictions to be lawful, consistent with the rule of law, and recognized as admissible, they must meet certain criteria: they must be provided for by law; should not affect the basic content of the law; must be dimensional to the goal (principle of proportionality); be carried out for lawful purposes, the list of which is exhaustive and not subject to expansion

Publisher

National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine

Subject

Law,Philosophy,History

Reference32 articles.

1. Petryshyn, O.V. (2020). General theory of law. Kharkiv: Pravo.

2. Babenko, A., Mazurenko, O., & Mernyk, A. (2019). Chronic alcoholism treatment in custodial facilities: Ukraine’s experience during independence. Wiadomości Lekarskie, 72(12/2), 2451-2456.

3. Mernyk, A., & Yaroshenko, O. (2021). Vaccination: Human right or duty. Georgian Medical News, 315(6), 135-141.

4. Slyvka, S.S. (2005). Natural and supernatural law. Kyiv: Attica.

5. Bukhanevych, O.M., Kuznichenko, S.O., & Mernyk, A.M. (2021). Foreign experience in constitutional and legal regulation of restrictions on human rights in conditions of emergency and martial law. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 28(2), 55-66.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Confiscation as a special sign of protection of intellectual property rights;Law. Human. Environment;2023-07-06

2. Circumstances to be proved in the investigation of violations of the laws or customs of war;Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav;2022-10-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3