The Rights of Man: Libertarians’ concern for men’s, but not women’s, reproductive autonomy (A summary and recontextualization of existing research)

Author:

Chalmers Jocelyn1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Psychology, University of Kent

Abstract

Libertarians claim individual autonomy as their central political principle, but historical and current evidence suggests this principle has been applied selectively. Reproductive decisions such as abortion can uniquely stress the concept of individual autonomy by placing into conflict the claimed rights of each biological parent to choose. We conducted two identical studies demonstrating that among US participants, libertarianism is associated with opposition to women’s reproductive autonomy but support for men’s. Self-identified libertarians tended to oppose women’s abortion rights, and support men’s right to both prevent women from having abortions (male veto), and withdraw financial support for a child when women refuse to terminate the pregnancy (financial abortion), and hostile sexism may account for libertarians’ selective support for men’s and not women’s reproductive autonomy. These results are discussed in the context of the recent reversal of the Roe vs. Wade supreme court ruling in the United States, imperiling a woman’s constitutional right to abortion.

Publisher

Brief Encounters Postgraduate Journal

Subject

General Medicine

Reference29 articles.

1. Boaz, D. (2020, February 28). Libertarianism. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/libertarianism-politics

2. Center for Reproductive Rights. (2017). Interactive map of the world’s abortion laws. World Abortion Laws 2017. Retrieved from http://worldabortionlaws.com/map/

3. The Rights of Man: Libertarian Concern for Men’s, But Not Women’s, Reproductive Autonomy;Chalmers, J.Petterson, A.Woodford, L.Sutton, R. M.;Political Psychology,2022

4. Diamant, J. (2020, June 18). Three-in-ten or more Democrats and Republicans don’t agree with their party on abortion. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/06/18/three-in-ten-or-more-democrats-and-republicans-dont-agree-with-their-party-on-abortion/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3