Development of Innovative Competence Model and Its Testing in the Course “Techno-Startup”

Author:

Solodikhina Anna A.1ORCID,Solodikhina Maria V.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National Research University Higher School of Economics

2. Moscow Pedagogical State University

Abstract

Introduction. Innovative evolution of the country requires preparing students for innovative activity and developing their innovative competence. But there is still no clear understanding as to how to effectively form and measure it. This article offers a model of innovation competence in the area of techno-innovation, which is based on the analysis of existing summarized models of innovation competence and consists of cognitive and non-cognitive components, each of which already has diagnostic tools. The purpose of the article is to describe the results of testing the proposed model of innovation competence in the process of specially organized training, as well as to identify effective teaching methods and tools for assessing innovation competence in higher engineering education. Materials and Methods. The article describes a comprehensive toolkit for assessing the changing of each component of innovation competence in the area of techno-innovation. It was used to identify the teaching methods most effective for the developing innovative competence in the process of teaching future techno-innovators at university. A quasi-experimental plan of research was used with the participation of 521 HSE students, who during a semester learned a specially created training course “Techno-Startup”. 58 trackers participated in the data collection. The results were subjected to statistical analysis: mean values, standard deviation values were calculated, linear regression model was applied. Results. It is found that the proposed toolkit has reliability and validity. On average, statistically significant improvement of studentʼs innovative competence in the focused learning of the course “Techno-Startup” was recorded relative to the control group. However, in 11–13% of students, motivation and personal attitudes decreased. It has been revealed that individual methods of teaching donʼt significantly influence the development of innovative competence of students, and it is necessary to use different methods in combination, each of which influences a specific component of competence. In the process of studying, the components of competence develop differently: the most noticeable growth of knowledge and skills, while personal attitudes and qualities practically does not change. Discussion and Conclusion. The obtained results contribute to the development of ideas about innovation competence, which can be useful in creating training programs for engineers and entrepreneurs in the technological sphere. Practical value has recommendations on the construction and content of the course, in the scope of which innovation competence is purposefully forms on the example of the discipline “Techno-Startup”.

Publisher

National Research Mordovia State University MRSU

Subject

Education,General Social Sciences,Cultural Studies,Linguistics and Language,Developmental and Educational Psychology

Reference30 articles.

1. Chan S., Yuen M. Personal and Environmental Factors Affecting Teachers’ Creativity-Fostering Practices in Hong Kong. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2014;12:69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.02.003

2. Marin-Garcia J.A., Andreu-Andrés Ma.A., Atarés-Huerta L., Aznar-Mas L.E., García-Carbonell A., González-Ladrón de Guevara F., et al. Proposal of a Framework for Innovation Competencies Development and Assessment (FINCODA). Working Papers on Operations Management. 2016;7(2):119–126. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308658507_Proposal_of_a_Framework_for_Innovation_Competencies_Development_and_Assessment_FINCODA (accessed 20.12.2022).

3. Naumkin N.I., Kondratieva G.A., Grosheva E.P., Kupryashkin V.F. Training Higher School Students in Rapid Prototyping Technology as a Final Stage of Their Preparation for Innovative Activities. Integratsiya obrazovaniya. 2018;22(3):519–534. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.092.022.201803.519-534

4. Naumkin N.I., Shekshaeva N.N., Kvitko S.I., Lomatkina M.V., Kupryashkin V.F., Korovina I.V. Designing the Teaching Model of Multilevel Gradual Training of Students in Innovative Engineering. Integratsiya obrazovaniya. 2019;23(4):568–586. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.097.023.201904.568-586

5. Ovbiagbonhia A., Kollöffel B., Brok P. Educating for Innovation: Students’ Perceptions of the Learning Environment and of Their Own Innovation Competence. Learning Environments Research. 2019;22:387–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09280-3

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3