Affiliation:
1. Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
2. Institute of Economics of the Ministry of Education and Science
Abstract
Introduction. Corruption in higher education continues to spread in modern society. Changing social relations in higher education can exacerbate corruption offenses in the educational environment. The purpose of the study is to analyze the anti-corruption mechanisms of university education management and make an empirical assessment of their effectiveness.
Materials and Methods. With the help of comparative and theoretical analysis, a model of anti-corruption management of university education is constructed. The modeling method made it possible to interpret the term “anti-corruption management mechanism in higher education”. The empirical base of the study rides on the results of a survey of 345 graduates of Yekaterinburg universities to identify the causes of corruption, the corruption situation, ways to prevent it, and an empirical assessment of the effectiveness of the proposed anti-corruption mechanisms of university education management.
Results. The classification of types and the content of anti-corruption mechanisms for managing university education is proposed on the basis of the policy pursued by the state. The developed model of anti-corruption management in university education includes four interrelated mechanisms: socio-psychological, legal, moral, and economic management ones.
Discussion and Conclusion. The results obtained contribute to the anti-corruption activities of the state. The proposed model of anti-corruption management is universal. Social management mechanisms have the least impact on the effectiveness of anti-corruption management.
Funder
Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Publisher
National Research Mordovia State University MRSU
Reference31 articles.
1. Dzhafarov N.K., Bagdasarova A.E. Corruption in the Russian Federation as a Global Problem of the State-Power System. Bulletin of Economic Security. 2022;(1):63–67. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.24412/2414-3995-2022-1-63-67
2. Grinko S.D. Anti-Corruption Issues in the System of Public Authorities and Local Government. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i kadry. 2022;(1):174–177. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48203648 (accessed 05.01.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Panzabekova A.Zh., Khalitova M.M., Rezer T.M. Functional and Structural Analysis of Anti-Corruption Institutions in Kazakhstan. Adam alemi. 2022;(1):114–127. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.48010/2022.1/1999-5849.10
4. Osipian A.L. Will Bribery and Fraud Converge? Comparative Corruption in Higher Education in Russia and the USA. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. 2014;44(2):252–273. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2012.728374
5. Deyneka O.S., Dukhanina L.N., Krylova D.V., Maksimenko A.A. Perceptions of Corruption in Higher Education among Alumni of the Leading Russian Universities. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2020;29(7):64–74. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-7-64-74
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献