Plagiarism in Secondary School: Minor Inaction with Major Consequences

Author:

Chekhovich Yury V.1ORCID,Belenkaya Olga S.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Control” of the Russian Academy of Sciences

2. Antiplagiat Company

Abstract

Introduction. The ease of searching and copying someone elseʼs text on almost any topic is one of the most important reasons for the prevalence of plagiarism in academic papers. While plagiarism detectors have become a common tool for universities, such systems are practically not used in secondary schools. It is considered to be a serious problem, that high school graduates are unprepared for the academic papers’ originality requirements. Universities are making efforts to overcome this lack of readiness. The authors study the attitude of teachers and learners of the Russian secondary schools toward the problem of plagiarism. Materials and Methods. An anonymous online survey of teachers (n = 2,286) and learners (m = 4,555) of secondary schools in the Vologda, Kaliningrad and Lipetsk regions of the Russian Federation was conducted. The survey was carried out through the Google Forms service. The quantitative and qualitative analysis of the obtained data was carried out. Results. Learners acquire the habit of plagiarism already in secondary school. Secondary school learners are loyal to copying someone elseʼs text without reference to the source; although they partially admit that by doing so they do wrong. Teachers are less tolerant to this and ready to respond to plagiarism in learners’ papers by lowering marks/grades or by requiring learners to redo the work. Teachers do not always clearly understand which borrowings can be considered legitimate and correct, and which ones are not, they cannot explain this to their learners, cannot instill in them the necessary academic integrity, and cannot establish clear criteria for works evaluation.The use of plagiarism detection systems in schools is unsystematic and it is often the result of the initiative of individual teachers. There is also no methodology for using plagiarism detection systems in secondary schools. Discussion and Conclusion. The conducted studies for the first time provided actual confirmation of the hypotheses. It means that it is necessary to include plagiarism detection systems in the toolkit used in secondary school. We have obtained evidence, that it is necessary to implement such tools in the secondary education system step by step, as well as to create conditions, so that school teachers can acquire relevant skills. The materials of the article will be useful to scientists who study the problems of secondary and high education, managers of the secondary education system at all levels, teachers, lecturers and learners of pedagogical universities.

Funder

Russian Foundation for Basic Research

Publisher

National Research Mordovia State University MRSU

Subject

Education,General Social Sciences,Cultural Studies,Linguistics and Language,Developmental and Educational Psychology

Reference33 articles.

1. Chekhovich Yu.V., Belenkaya O.S. Methodology for the Implementation and Use of Text Reuse Detection Systems in Secondary Education. Informatics and Education. 2021;(10):5–14. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2021-36-10-5-14

2. LaDuke R.D. Academic Dishonesty Today, Unethical Practices Tomorrow? Journal of Professional Nursing. 2013;29(6):402–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.10.009

3. Bolkunov I.A. [Cheating at School: Cheating in School: Reasons, Parameters, Ways to Reduced]. Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education. 2022;(74-2):42–45. Available at: https://gpa.cfuv.ru/attachments/article/5387/Выпуск%2074%20часть%202,%202022%20год.pdf (accessed 04.01.2023). (In Russ.)

4. Vakurova O.A., Filippova O.A. Formation and Assessment of Skills of Independent Preparation of Written Works in General. Open Education. 2021;25(3):4–14. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2021-3-4-14

5. Nikitov A.V., Orchakov O.A., Chehovich Yu.V. Plagiarism in Works of Undergraduate and Graduate Learners: Problem and Methods of Counteraction. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2012;(5):61–68. Available at: https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/view/506 (accessed 04.01.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3