Quality Assurance in Higher Education in the Context of European Approaches

Author:

Izmailova Marina A.1ORCID,Korneva Evgenia Yu.2ORCID,Makolov Vasily I.3ORCID,Salimova Tatiana A.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

2. Programs of the Association of Certification “Russian Register” for Independent Assessments of the Quality of Education

3. Russian State University for the Humanities

4. National Research Mordovia State University

Abstract

Introduction. Quality assurance issues are among the priorities in the activities of Russian and European universities. In this regard, the authors of the articles explore various approaches to quality assurance in educational organizations; analyze the results of the study related to the assessment of European procedures, models and mechanisms of quality assurance implemented in Russi an universities. Materials and Methods. At the end of 2019, the authors conducted a survey using the Google Docs service of expert representatives across various types of Russian universities. The study involved 104 experts from 50 regions of Russia. The study was based on an expert online survey and statistical analysis of the results. Results. The results of the survey indicate that in Russian universities the most widespread models are quality assurance based on the requirements of state accreditation and a model based on ESG ENQA standards. Higher education institutions give priority to the development of basic documents to guarantee the quality of education at the institutional level without regulating the non-key aspects of education. In most universities, the responsibility for coordinating activities in the field of quality is assigned to the vice-rector (usually for academic studies). Universities are quite actively conducting surveys of students; it is on this group of interested parties that they emphasize the process of implementing feedback on the quality of education. It is common practice to discuss the results of analysis of surveys of stakeholders at the level of academic councils/senates. The most common quality assurance tools include: interviewing students, employers, teaching staff and employees on the quality of education, monitoring the employment and career growth of graduates, and professional and public accreditation. Most respondents indicated such priority problems as the lack of a unified model for ensuring the quality of education and the shortage of qualified personnel in the field of ensuring the quality of education. Discussion and Conclusion. The results of this study may be useful for further improving the quality of education systems in Russian universities in the context of the Bologna process development.

Funder

Erasmus+

Publisher

National Research Mordovia State University MRSU

Subject

Education

Reference27 articles.

1. Horvatova Z., Chaikova A. Socio-Economic Aspects of the European Union Policy in the Field of Education. Integratsiya obrazovaniya = Integration of Education. 2018; 22(3):412-425. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.092.022.201803.412-425

2. Salimova Т., Vatolkina N., Makolov V. Vectors of Quality Management System Development in Transition to Industry 4.0. Standarty i kachestvo = Standards and Quality. 2018; (8):44-48. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326776649_VECTORS_OF_QUALITY_MANAGEMENT_SYSTEM_DEVELOPMENT_IN_TRANSITION_TO_INDUSTRY_40 (accessed 12.01.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

3. Makarkin N.P., Cherkasov V.D., Fadeeva I.M., Makolov V.I. The Development of Investigation Potential in the System of Strategic Priority in University. Universitetskoye upravleniye: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2008; (6):46-51. Available at: https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/view/763/764# (accessed 12.01.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

4. Ashmarina S.I., Kandrashina E.A., Izmailov A.M., Mirzayev N.G. Gaps in the System of Higher Education in Russia in Terms of Digitalization. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. 2020; 908:437-443. Available at: https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85062258934&origin=resultslist (accessed 01.02.2020). (In Eng.)

5. Ashmarina S.I., Lebedeva L.G., Tokarev Y.A., Izmailov A.M. Students’ and Their Parents’ Choice of Higher Education Institution in the Era of Digitalization. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. 2020; 84:514-525. Available at: https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85070228374&origin=resultslist (accessed 01.02.2020). (In Eng.)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Why and how to create training sessions in the form of a game at a university?;Vestnik of Samara State Technical University Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences;2022-07-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3