Modern Trends in Further Professional Education of Judges: Russian and Foreign Experience

Author:

Burdina Elena V.1ORCID,Alexandrov Sergey V.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Russian State University of Justice

2. Arbitration Court of the Republic of Mordovia

Abstract

Introduction. Modern further professional judicial education has a direct impact on the institutional and personal parameters of judicial independence and has a public significance as a guarantee of a judge's competence during his long career. The relevance of the research consists in development and substantiation of theoretical and methodological foundations of further professional education of judges as an independent form of their continuing education. The aim of the article is to systematize Russian and foreign experience in the organization of judicial professional development, to fill in the need for a comprehensive solution of legal, organizational and educational issues of judicial re-training, to substantiate promising models of the educational process and educational practices of continuous training of judges. Materials and Methods. The object of the study was further professional education of judges as a state-legal and educational institute. The comparative nature of the research, based on the study of modern domestic and foreign experience in organizing further education for judges, provided data that had not previously been analyzed in the Russian scholarly literature. On the basis of a comprehensive (interdisciplinary) approach, conclusions were obtained concerning both the issues of legal regulation of the procedure of further professional education of judges and issues of pedagogical nature. A systematic analysis of further professional education of judges predetermined the identification of specific features of teacher training, the nature of training programs, methods and technologies of training of judges. Sociological methods were used to formulate conclusions on the conditions of admissibility of the electronic educational process in the judicial classroom. The research drew on electronic resources that reveal organizational peculiarities and educational practices of national and foreign judicial schools. Results. Regularities determining the trends in the evolution of further professional education of judges in Russia and abroad have been determined and disclosed. Models of judicial schools operating in foreign states depending on their legal status, nature and types of educational processes were identified. The principles of organization of further professional education of judges, allowing to distinguish this type of education from traditional systems of higher legal education, were substantiated. Proposals for improving the legal and educational model of the Russian judicial school are formulated. Discussion and Conclusion. The results of the study can be useful for the further development of the theory of specialized judicial education, the definition of the legal status of the Russian judicial school that performs the functions of continuing education of judges, as well as for improving the educational process, given the need for methodological diversity of further programs and methods of training of judges.

Publisher

National Research Mordovia State University MRSU

Subject

Education

Reference25 articles.

1. Ignatyeva G.A. Andragogy of Semyon Grigoryevich Vershlovsky – a Social and Pedagogical Discovery for Adult Education in the XXI Century. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie. 2021;(1):4–8. Available at: https://spbappo.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/НО_выпуск_35.pdf (accessed 02.04.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

2. Rimskaya O.N., Anokhov I.V., Kranbikhler V.S. Human Capital in Industry 4.0. Present and Future. The Economics of Science. 2021;7(4):275–289. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2021-7-4-275-289

3. Bermus A.G., Serikov V.V., Altynikova N.V. Content of Pedagogical Education in the Modern World: Meanings, Problems, Practices and Development Prospects. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics. 2021;18(4):667–691. doi: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-4-667-691

4. Sukhareva M.A. Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of Continuous Education. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 21. Upravlenie (gosudarstvo i obshchestvo). 2019;(2):16–27. Available at: http://vestnik21msu.ru/articles/article/4582/# (accessed 02.04.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

5. Arkhipova L.B., Lapaeva V.V. [Professional Retraining and Advanced Training of Judges and Court Staff]. Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2007;(4):93–100. (In Russ.)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3