A Guide to Selecting a Measurement Tool for Quality of Life Assessment

Author:

Abstract

Modern approaches to patient treatment and personalized medicine increasingly recognize the importance of the patient’s quality of life outcome. The art of assessing and using quality of life information in routine practice remains a challenge and poses a stumbling block for clinicians. This critical review of the literature identifies useful measures to minimize those challenges and guide nurses and researchers in selecting the correct tool for measuring quality of life in their clinical setting.

Publisher

Opast Group LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference150 articles.

1. 1. C A O’ Boyle, D Waldron (1997) “Quality of life issues in

2. palliative medicine,” in Journal of Neurology 244: 4.

3. 2. D Armstrong (1993) “Public Health Spaces and the Fabrication

4. of Identity,” Sociology 27: 393-410.

5. 3. WHOQoL Group (1993) “Study protocol for the World Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3