Sensitive Analysis of Natural Language Processing Using for MOORA Method

Author:

Abstract

Natural Language Processing (NLP) constitutes a crucial field in the realm of artificial intelligence, concentrating on the interplay between computers and human language. The goal is to empower machines to understand, interpret, and produce human language, thereby closing the divide between humans and computers. Various techniques have been proposed for NLP tasks, and one such method gaining attention is MOORA. In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis and performance evaluation of NLP tasks using the MOORA method. The MOORA method, also known as Multi-Objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis, is a multi-criteria decision-making technique used for evaluating and ranking alternatives when faced with multiple criteria simultaneously. Its application in NLP tasks offers a promising approach to handle diverse challenges and improve overall system performance. We begin by discussing the fundamental concepts of NLP, including its subfields, applications, and existing methodologies. Subsequently, the MOORA method's theoretical underpinnings are presented, we conduct experiments on a range of common NLP tasks text summarization, and machine translation. For each task, we define relevant criteria, establish performance metrics, and identify suitable alternatives. The results obtained from the MOORA-based evaluations are compared against traditional NLP approaches, such as rule-based systems, statistical models, and deep learning algorithms. Our findings reveal that the MOORA method excels in handling multiple objectives and criteria, leading to improved accuracy, robustness, and adaptability in NLP tasks. Moreover, we investigate the impact of various parameters and data preprocessing techniques on the MOORA-based NLP models to identify best practices and potential areas for further enhancement. The alternatives are Tool A: OpenNLP, Tool B: SpaCy, Tool C: NLTK, Tool D: Stanford NLP, Tool E: Gensim, Tool F: CoreNLP, Tool G: TextBlob and Tool H: Amazon Comprehend. The evaluation parameters are Accuracy, Speed, Language Support, Sentiment Analysis, Cost, User-Friendliness, Documentation and Community Support. Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK) is got first rank and Tool H: Amazon Comprehend is got lowest rank.

Publisher

REST Publisher

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3