Material selection using Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution EDAS Mehtod

Abstract

Material selection Introduction: Material selection is design Any step in the process Also refers to physical substance. In the context of prod-uct design, the main objective of material selection is, Product performance when meeting goals Reduces costs. Given with usage, features and costs The starting object is the candidate Methodology of products Best for exam. Material selection is often a material symbol or differ-ential heat transfer from the given temperature to reduce Relevant performance to benefit Desired using code Material has properties, A ther-mal blanket is the worst heat Has conductivity. A Characteristics of the designer's materials Thorough knowledge of behavior should be. Sub-ject selection is requirements of a given application Perfectly suited to complement, It is the process of selecting the material. under their working conditions Mechanical properties, chemical properties, Physical properties, electrical properties, cost Various factors such as exami-nation requirements make decisions. of the material selection process. Research significance: Material selection is of a given application Very suitable to meet the needs It is the process of selecting the object. Mechanical properties, chemical properties, Physical properties, electrical properties and cost In deciding the exam requirements like Various factors go into it. In the context of product design, the main objective of material selection is, Product performance goals Cost reduction while meeting. Best for a given application Proper selection of material, can-didate properties of materials and Starting with costs. Methodology: based on the distance from the mean solution evaluation (EDAS) is a new and efficient MCDM is proper. In this way alternatives are preferred based on their distance from the mean solution is determined. From the analysis in which EDAS (Avg evaluation based on distance from solution) method is the best solution. Short range and negative the ideal is the solution with the longest distance from the solution determines, but of these distances the comparison is not significant. Alternative: Aluminum 2024-26, Aluminum 5052-0, Stainless Steel 301-FH, Stainless Steel 310-3AH, titanium Ti–6Al–4V, Inconel 718. Evaluation Preference: Toughness index, Yield strength, Young’s modulus, Density, Thermal conductivity, Specific heat Results: From the result it is seen that Stainless Steel 301-FH is got the first rank where as is the titanium Ti–6Al–4V is having the lowest rank. Conclusion: As a result, stainless steel 301-FH ranked first, while titanium Ti–6Al-4V ranked lowest.