Las agencias de gobierno en Uruguay: características y autonomía de la administración descentralizada

Author:

Freigedo Martín,Fuentes Guillermo,Milanesi Alejandro,Ramos Conrado,Ruiz Díaz Matías

Abstract

The creation of agencies has become a popular trend in the world and in Latin America since the New Public Management reforms. Agencies are organizations with greater levels of autonomy from the center of government, which gives them, in theory, greater independence from political fluctuations while they are capable of being more efficient in the quality and management of their services. This article presents the application in Uruguay of the COBRA (Comparative Public Organization Data Base for Research and Analysis – network) project methodology for characterizing and measuring the levels of autonomy of decentralized public sector agencies. Based on the application of a questionnaire to qualified informants, the study analyzes 56 decentralized entities in Uruguay from 2015 to 2020. Among its main results, it shows that there are no significant differences in terms of autonomy in policy definition or resource management between entities governed by public law and those of non-state type. It also highlights that the largest decentralized entities, both those dedicated to the provision of public welfare services and those of a commercial nature, continue to operate predominantly within the framework of public law and enjoy significant levels of autonomy with respect to the center of government. On the other hand, despite their steady growth, the creation of agencies in Uruguay (or smaller administrative structures governed by or with similar characteristics to those of private law) does not evidence a search for greater managerial autonomy with respect to the organizational formats typical of public law. These institutional formats reflect a pattern of State functioning built on partisan control, negotiations and political co-participation, rather than a logic focused on efficiency or management improvements.

Publisher

Centro Latinoamericano de Administración para el Desarrollo

Reference32 articles.

1. Boschi, Renato y Gaitán, Flavio (2009), “Legados, política y consenso desarrollista”, en Nueva Sociedad, Nº 224, noviembre-diciembre, pp. 14-33.

2. Bouckaert, Geert y Peters, B. Guy (2004), “What Is Available and What Is Missing in the Study of Quangos?”, en Unbundled Government. A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation, Christopher Pollitt y Colin Talbot (eds.), London, Routledge.

3. Christensen, Tom y Laegreid, Per (2007), Transcending New Public Management. The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms, London, Routledge.

4. Echebarría, Koldo (1993), “La gestión pública a través de agencias: experiencias europeas”, en Ekonomiaz, Vol. 26 N° 2, pp. 170-197.

5. Egeberg, Morten (2003), “How Bureaucratic Structures Matter. An Organizational Perspective”, en Handbook of Public Administration, B. Guy Peters y Jon Pierre (eds.), London, Sage.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3