¿Qué relevancia tienen los proyectos de buenas prácticas como estrategia para la gestión del conocimiento? Análisis de caso del Banco de Buenas Prácticas en Derechos Sociales del Ayuntamiento de Barcelona

Author:

Barbieri Muttis Nicolás,Fierro Fidalgo Yolanda

Abstract

Best practice databases have spread as part of the knowledge management strategies in public administration. However, research on its objectives, methodologies and impacts is still scarce. What potential and challenges does these initiatives have when trying to revalue the professionals’ knowledge and their participation? What kind of results and impact do they have? This paper builds a guide to answer these questions, identifying three key dimensions for the analysis of good-practice databases: 1) the methodology, 2) the communication of its results and 3) the impact on the people responsible for the practices. The article applies this guide to the analysis of the Best Practice on Social Rights Database of Barcelona City Council and identifies key aspects. Regarding the methodology, reliability and suitability of the practices included in the databases is still a challenge. However, there are mechanisms to ensure rigorous analysis and avoid distrust in best practices databases. Regarding the communication of results, knowledge transferability cannot be taken for granted. The kind of information to communicate is a key factor: the more contextualized and realistic (no only emphasizing positive aspects) the information is, the more possibilities of being transferred will exist. Finally, regarding the assessment and the impact of the best practice databases, this document identifies some strategies of what has been called second generation of knowledge management. It is essential to design specific mechanisms so that the best practices databases can have an impact on the learning, particularly in relation to the group of professionals involved.

Publisher

Centro Latinoamericano de Administración para el Desarrollo

Reference17 articles.

1. Andrews, M. (2012), “The Logical Limits of Best Practice Administrative Solutions in Developing Countries”, en Public Administration and Development, Vol. 32 N° 2, pp. 137-153.

2. Bechberger, E.; Page, E.; y Wolman, H. (2008), “Understanding the Market for ‘Good Practice’ Advice from Government Research and Evaluation”, paper presented at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August, 28-31.

3. Bendixsen, S. y De Guchteneire, P. (2003), “Best Practices in Immigration Services Planning”, en Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 22 N° 4, pp. 677-682.

4. Brannan, T.; Durose, C.; John, P.; y Wolman, H. (2008), “Assessing Best Practice as a Means of Innovation”, en Local Government Studies, Vol. 34 N° 1, pp. 23-38.

5. Brugué, Q.; Blanco, I.; y Boada, J. (2014), “Entornos y motores para la innovación en las políticas públicas”, en Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, N° 59, junio, pp. 5-34.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3