Affiliation:
1. MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR.
2. MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR. (İNGİLİZCE)
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this in vitro study is to evaluate the micro-gap changes in three dimensions after thermodynamic loading between hybrid abutment crowns made of different materials and implants with internal conical connection.
Methods: A total of 10 morse cone connection implants (Straumann Bone Level Implant, Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) were used. In this study, two study groups were formed using lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LD) and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) in hybrid abutment-crown production (n=5). Hybrid abutment-crowns were fabricated by CAD/CAM system. Hybrid abutment crowns were designed and manufactured digitally. A 4-month of clinical cycle was applied to the samples in the chewing simulator. The micro-gap at the implant- abutment interface was visualized with micro-CT before and after thermodynamic loading. Micro-gap change was determined using these obtained images. For comparisons, independent t-test was used.
Results: When comparing the micro-gap volumes before and after aging, no significant difference was observed between the LD and PMMA groups. The micro-gap increase after loading was 0.68 ±0.209 in the LD group and 0.45 ±0.373 in the PMMA group. Although the increase was higher in the LD group, there is no statistically significant difference between two groups.
Conclusion: he micro-gap in the interface of implants and hybrid abutment crowns increased after aging. Hybrid abutment-crown material affected the micro-gap increase, but it was not statistically significant.
Funder
Marmara Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi
Subject
General Materials Science
Reference32 articles.
1. Singla S, Kumar L, Rathee M. Know your implant connections. Afr J Oral Health. 2018;6(2): 1-7. DOI:10.4314/ajoh.v6i2.162380
2. Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;8(5): 537-552. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70208-8
3. Sailer I, Sailer T, Stawarczyk B, Jung RE, Hämmerle CH. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(5):850-858. DOI:10.5167/uzh-26251
4. Gupta S, Gupta H, Tandan A. Technical complications of implant-causes and management: A comprehensive review. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2015;6(1):3-8. DOI: 10.4103/0975-5950.168233
5. Koutouzis, T. Implant-abutment connection as contributing factor to peri-implant diseases. Periodontology. 2019;81(1):152–166. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12289