Abstract
When international companies seek to establish legitimacy, it involves different stakeholders locally and globally. This paper analyses corporate communication in order to trace the discursive construction of the customers, investors, staff and authoritiess from whom legitimacy is sought.
It is argued that the notion of legitimacy hinges on accountability, i.e. on the selection of groups to whom the writers feel responsible. Annual reports from the airline industry are used to test previous results that are based on concepts of Eastern collectivity and Western individuality. It is shown that this distinction is misleading: contrary to expectation, management construes accountability in similar ways vis-à-vis investors; in relation to the staff, the East-West difference runs along unexpected status-related lines.
Publisher
International Collaboration for Research and Publications
Subject
Communication,Cultural Studies,Strategy and Management,Education,Linguistics and Language,Gender Studies,Public Administration
Reference37 articles.
1. Aerts, W. (2005). Picking up the pieces: impression management in the retrospective attributional framing of accounting outcomes. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30.6, 493-517.
2. Aerts, W. and Cormier, D. (2009). Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 34 .1, 1-27.
3. Amernic, J. and Craig, R. (2009). Understanding accounting through conceptual metaphor. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20.8, 875-883.
4. Argenti, P.A. and Forman, J. (2002). The power of corporate communication. Crafting the voice and image of your business. New York: MacGraw-Hill.
5. Boje, D.M. (2001). Corporate writing in the web of Postmodern culture and postindustrial capitalism. Managements Communication Quarterly,14, 508-516.