Role of Leader-Member Exchange, Knowledge Hiding, Prosocial Motivation, And Impression Management Motivation for The Creative Potential of Employees
-
Published:2023-09-10
Issue:
Volume:
Page:68-81
-
ISSN:1404-1634
-
Container-title:Journal of Intercultural Communication
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JICC
Author:
Manadin AdeORCID, Komariah Aan1ORCID, Nurdin Diding1ORCID, Prihatin Eka1ORCID, Priatna Asep2ORCID, Nuphanudin Nuphanudin3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Educational Sciences, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia 2. Faculty of Teacher and Education Sciences, Universitas Mandiri, Subang, West Java, Indonesia. 3. Institut Agama Islam Latifah Mubarokiyah, Suryalaya Tasikmalaya , Indonesia.
Abstract
The main purpose of the research was to investigate whether employees who develop a high-quality leader-member exchange (LMX), do they also engage in knowledge exchange activities or they hide knowledge, and do their knowledge hiding affects creativity. Data for this investigation were collected from 413 subordinates and their respective 57 supervisors working in a pharmaceutical organisation operating in Jakarta, Indonesia. The collected data was then analyzed for regression and mediated moderation with MPlus. We found that LMX may have a negative side, as those in quality exchange relationships with supervisors may hide knowledge from others, which may affect the creative potential of employees. With this research, we have shown that interpersonal mechanisms in general and LMX in particular will not always be beneficial for the exchange of knowledge and creativity of employees. We contributed to creativity research by introducing prosocial motivation and impression-management motivation as having a moderating role in knowledge hiding and creativity relationships. Our research revealed that the motivation of a focal employee overrides knowledge hiding, the underlying social exchange, knowledge hiding, and creativity relationships. The motivation of focal employees influences the social exchange patterns by affecting knowledge hiding among coworkers, thereby enhancing/ suppressing their creativity. Limitations and future research directions were also discussed.
Publisher
International Collaboration for Research and Publications
Subject
Communication,Cultural Studies,Strategy and Management,Education,Linguistics and Language,Gender Studies,Public Administration
Reference82 articles.
1. Acar, O. A., Tarakci, M., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2019). Creativity and innovation under constraints: A cross-disciplinary integrative review. Journal of Management, 45(1), 96-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318805832 2. Adeel, A., Batool, S., Daisy, K. M. H., & Khan, M. K. (2022). LMX and creative idea validation: The role of helping and bullying. Asian Academy of Management Journal. 27(2), 107-134. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2022.27.2.6 3. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage. 4. Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (1998). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: a field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 247. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.247 5. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(2), 357-376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|