2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infectionsa

Author:

Lipsky Benjamin A.1,Berendt Anthony R.2,Cornia Paul B.3,Pile James C.4,Peters Edgar J. G.5,Armstrong David G.6,Deery H. Gunner7,Embil John M.8,Joseph Warren S.9,Karchmer Adolf W.10,Pinzur Michael S.11,Senneville Eric12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle

2. Bone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford

3. Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Veteran Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle

4. Divisions of Hospital Medicine and Infectious Diseases, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio

5. Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

6. Southern Arizona Limb Salvage Alliance, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson

7. Northern Michigan Infectious Diseases, Petoskey

8. Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

9. Division of Podiatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Roxborough Memorial Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

10. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

11. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois

12. Department of Infectious Diseases, Dron Hospital, Tourcoing, France

Abstract

Foot infections are a common and serious problem in persons with diabetes. Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) typically begin in a wound, most often a neuropathic ulceration. While all wounds are colonized with microorganisms, the presence of infection is defined by ≥2 classic findings of inflammation or purulence. Infections are then classified into mild (superficial and limited in size and depth), moderate (deeper or more extensive), or severe (accompanied by systemic signs or metabolic perturbations). This classification system, along with a vascular assessment, helps determine which patients should be hospitalized, which may require special imaging procedures or surgical interventions, and which will require amputation. Most DFIs are polymicrobial, with aerobic gram-positive cocci (GPC), and especially staphylococci, the most common causative organisms. Aerobic gram-negative bacilli are frequently copathogens in infections that are chronic or follow antibiotic treatment, and obligate anaerobes may be copathogens in ischemic or necrotic wounds. Wounds without evidence of soft tissue or bone infection do not require antibiotic therapy. For infected wounds, obtain a post-debridement specimen (preferably of tissue) for aerobic and anaerobic culture. Empiric antibiotic therapy can be narrowly targeted at GPC in many acutely infected patients, but those at risk for infection with antibiotic-resistant organisms or with chronic, previously treated, or severe infections usually require broader spectrum regimens. Imaging is helpful in most DFIs; plain radiographs may be sufficient, but magnetic resonance imaging is far more sensitive and specific. Osteomyelitis occurs in many diabetic patients with a foot wound and can be difficult to diagnose (optimally defined by bone culture and histology) and treat (often requiring surgical debridement or resection, and/or prolonged antibiotic therapy). Most DFIs require some surgical intervention, ranging from minor (debridement) to major (resection, amputation). Wounds must also be properly dressed and off-loaded of pressure, and patients need regular follow-up. An ischemic foot may require revascularization, and some nonresponding patients may benefit from selected adjunctive measures. Employing multidisciplinary foot teams improves outcomes. Clinicians and healthcare organizations should attempt to monitor, and thereby improve, their outcomes and processes in caring for DFIs.

Publisher

American Podiatric Medical Association

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 91 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3